Love in the workplace: employment law considerations

16 July 2026

Love in the workplace: employment law considerations

By Amber Willemsen

Cupid does not let his arrows be guided by HR policies. That situations of love at the work place do not always come without consequences became clear again after the Coldplay concert end of 2025.

Under the watchful eyes of thousands of concertgoers, the CEO and the Head of HR of the American company Astronomer openly revealed their secret affair. When the kiss cam moment went viral, it was shortly afterwards reported that the CEO had been dismissed because of the affair. A good moment to consider the legal implications of romance in the workplace.

Conflicts of interest and integrity

A romantic relationship between two colleagues does not necessarily give rise to employment law issues. However, if the colleagues are in a hierarchical relationship, their relationship may create (the appearance of) a conflict of interest. Examples include situations in which performance reviews are influenced, or discussions about promotions, salary increases or other forms of preferential treatment arise. To prevent disputes and complications afterwards, it is advisable to include and enforce clear rules in the employee handbook regarding workplace relationships.

No prohibition, but a duty to report

Love is a personal matter in which the employer should generally not interfere. Nevertheless, provided there is a clear and written policy, an employer may in certain circumstances expect employees to disclose workplace relationships. This may apply, for example, where a manager enters into a relationship with a subordinate. In such cases, the employer can take measures in order to avoid (the appearance of) conflicts of interest.

Social safety and the employer’s responsibility

The social safety of employees is increasingly high on employers’ agendas. Employers have a duty to ensure a safe working environment. Particularly when relationships end, tensions or even inappropriate behaviour in the workplace may arise. Employers are therefore advised to anticipate such situations through policy measures, such as appointing a confidential adviser and establishing reporting procedures.

Measures and sanctions

Although the CEO of Astronomer lost his position following the revelation of his romantic workplace relationship, matters will not always escalate so quickly under Dutch employment law. A romantic relationship in itself is not a ground for dismissal. However, if the relationship leads to an unworkable employment situation or an unsafe working environment, measures or sanctions may be appropriate. Depending on the circumstances, options may include reassignment or arrangements allowing employees to alternate working from home. Only in exceptional cases will dismissal be considered. It is always advisable to consult a lawyer before taking measures or imposing sanctions.

Conclusion

In short, romance in the workplace is not generally prohibited, but it does require careful handling. Good policies are half the work, but tailored solutions remain essential. The employment lawyers at GMW advocaten are happy to advise you on updating your employee handbook and on discussing and guiding specific situations.

More information

Do you have questions following this article? Please feel free to contact us.

Related blogs

Previous slide
Next slide

22 October 2026

Racist images in a group chat: summary dismissal too severe

Do racist messages in a private group chat with colleagues justify summary dismissal? The Hague Court of Appeal held that they did not, and criticised the employer for the process it had followed.

Read more

Read more about

17 September 2026

Dismissal for lying about working from home

Incorrectly registering a workplace can constitute an urgent reason for summary dismissal. The Rotterdam District Court recently confirmed this in a judgment. The case concerned an employee of online bank Bunq. Over a period of three months, the employee stated 21 times that he was working from the office in Rotterdam, while other data showed that he was not at the office.

Read more

Read more about

3 September 2026

Employer, may I move to a competitor?

Many employers include a non-compete and/or non-solicitation clause in their employment contracts. If an employee wants to work for a client or a competitor of the employer, and the employer does not allow this, the employee may feel compelled to take the matter to court. That was also the case in a ruling by the Zeeland-West Brabant Subdistrict Court in May 2025.

Read more

Read more about

27 August 2026

Works council and right of consent for changes to home working policy

Around the summer of 2025, two judgments were published on a highly topical issue: changes to home working policy. From the United States, a trend seems to be spreading to the Netherlands in which companies are trying to force employees to work from the office more often, or even full-time.

Read more

Read more about

13 August 2026

New Act on Transfer of Undertakings in Bankruptcy (WOVOF): consequences for employees and restart entrepreneurs

Some time ago, a blog was published on our website about the protection of employees in a restart following bankruptcy. It was relevant then and remains a topical issue now, as the Act on the Transfer of Undertakings in Bankruptcy (Wet Overgang van Onderneming in Faillissement, WOVOF) is approaching.

Read more

Read more about
All articles