10 September 2020

Like gentlemen

By Raymond de Mooij

The pretty, Asian woman sitting across from me was visibly disconcerted.

Her hand trembled as she handed me a default judgment. Lucy Chin had to vacate a store due to a rental debt. “I own a beauty salon near the Binnenhof,” my client said. “I recently got a new landlord, an Englishman. He is called Peter Rude, a really terrible guy.”

In any event, the landlord had shown little understanding for the financial problems my client faced as a result of the corona crisis.

“When I transferred slightly less rent in April, he was immediately on the doorstep,” said Lucy Chin. “He scolded me and hit the shop window hard. While there was a customer inside.”

My client then wrote to her landlord requesting his agreement with a rental discount of 20 percent. This led to a return visit by the landlord to the client’s shop. This time Peter Rude brought his lawyer, Mr. Harold Trip, with him. “The two of them yelled at me for half an hour. That lawyer was worse than my landlord.”

When Lucy Chin wanted to enter her shop a few days later in the morning, it turned out to be impossible: the lock on the door was sealed with glue. That evening she received a call from Peter Rude. “He laughed and asked if I had closed my shop properly. I think he was drunk and called from a pub.” When my client received another call from the same number shortly afterwards, she recorded the call.

She let me listen to the recording. After Peter Rude scolded my client, Mr. Harold Trip came on the phone. The lawyer said he would ensure Lucy Chin would go bankrupt and be put on the street with her child. The roaring went on for twenty minutes.

On behalf of my client, I had a notice of opposition issued and filed a counterclaim. I argued that the eviction of the rented property was not justified due to the low rent arrears. My client was willing to leave voluntarily, however, because she wanted nothing more to do with Peter Rude and Mr. Trip. However, the 30,000 Euros she had previously invested in the store had to be compensated.

One day after the summons was served, I received a call from Peter Rude. “I read your summons. My compliments,” said the man sweetly. “But isn’t it better if we settle the matter? That way we save both time and money.”

I took a deep breath. “So you want to arrange things properly?” I asked.

“That’s right,” replied Mr. Rude. “Or as we say in England: like gentlemen.”

 

This column was written for Den Haag Centraal, in which Raymond de Mooij writes monthly about what he experiences in his practice.

Raymond de Mooij

Raymond de Mooij

Lawyer / partner

Related blogs

Previous slide
Next slide

20 November 2025

Can you claim compensation for non-material damage under Dutch real estate and tenancy law?

In recent years, we have received an increasing number of questions about compensation for non-material (immaterial) damage. Expats in particular are often used to the idea that, alongside compensation for material loss, there is also scope for compensation for more abstract harm, such as anxiety, distress, or impact on private life.

Read more

Read more about

6 November 2025

The second opinion procedure in appeal

Since 2013, the Court of Appeal in The Hague has offered the second opinion procedure in appeal cases. This procedure aims to provide parties with a faster and less expensive reassessment of their case, as an alternative to the regular appeal procedure. This article discusses the legal basis, process, and the (dis)advantages of the procedure.

Read more

Read more about

17 September 2025

Rent increase following the sustainability upgrade of a property

More and more property owners are becoming aware of the need to make their homes more sustainable. There are various sustainability measures they can take.

Read more

Read more about

20 August 2025

On second thought

The statutory reflection period when purchasing a property

Read more

Read more about

6 August 2025

Amendment of contracts

In contract law, the principle of pacta sunt servanda applies. This Latin phrase means that agreements must generally be fulfilled. Although this rule is not explicitly stated in the law, it forms the basis for the legal obligations arising from contracts.

Read more

Read more about
All articles