17 February 2021

Guide for employers in vaccination maze

By Koen Vermeulen

Anyone who told an employer outside of healthcare a year ago that they should be involved in vaccination issues would have been declared crazy.

Now, almost every day, employers are wondering what they can or should do with all the information and advice from the government and questions from employees about vaccination against the coronavirus. Below we guide the employer through this maze of vaccination problems in the workplace.

Impose a vaccination obligation?

An employer cannot oblige its employees to be vaccinated against the coronavirus. There is no legal basis within or outside employment law. This also applies to an indirect duty, so punishing an employee with a transfer or even dismissal if s/he does not agree to be vaccinated, does not seem to be legally tenable.

Grant a vaccination bonus?

The opposite of punishment is to encourage certain behaviour by offering the prospect of financial reward, such as granting a one-off amount to employees who have been vaccinated. This can be compared with the so-called absenteeism bonus, in which an employee is granted extra days off if s/he does not report sick for one quarter. In my opinion, this is permissible according to employment law – however it is not permitted by the GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation). After all, in order to be able to pay a vaccination bonus, the employer will inevitably register that an employee has been vaccinated. There seems to be no basis for processing medical personal data in this way.

Ask for a vaccination certificate?

On 4 February, the Health Council of the Netherlands offered the Minister of Health, Welfare and Sport an assessment framework for whether an employer may request a vaccination certificate from employees. The advice is “yes” this is allowed on the provision that, among other things, the following circumstances are taken into account:

  • The employer clarifies the purpose (such as protecting employees or others),
  • It has added value compared to other measures such as a negative test result or mouth masks,
  • What the consequences are if the employee does not show proof of vaccination,
  • The risk of discrimination against employees who cannot or do not want to be vaccinated for medical or religious reasons,
  • Whether the nature of the profession justifies a vaccination certificate and can be effective,
  • Registration of a vaccination certificate is contrary to the GDPR, only “showing” is possible.

Whether the minister will convert this advice into legislation will be clear at the beginning of March 2021. At the beginning of February, the Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport website explicitly stated: “As an employer, you may not refuse customers or staff without a vaccination certificate.”

Register vaccination data?

This aspect has already been discussed briefly above. No, because of the GDPR, an employer may not record whether or not an employee has been vaccinated. The grounds for processing medical personal data referred to in the GDPR do not provide a basis for this. The consent given by the employee for registration is also not a valid basis because, due to the subordination in the employment relationship, the starting point is that the required voluntary consent is not provided. The Dutch Data Protection Authority (AP) can enforce this.

Disclaimer: the above is our status at the beginning of February. This can change quickly, for example if the Minister of Health, Welfare and Sport comes up with a response to the Health Council’s advice.

If you, as an employer, are feeling lost in the vaccination maze, the experts of GMW lawyers will be happy to show you the right way.

Koen Vermeulen

Lawyer/associate partner

Related blogs

Previous slide
Next slide

3 September 2026

Employer, may I move to a competitor?

Many employers include a non-compete and/or non-solicitation clause in their employment contracts. If an employee wants to work for a client or a competitor of the employer, and the employer does not allow this, the employee may feel compelled to take the matter to court. That was also the case in a ruling by the Zeeland-West Brabant Subdistrict Court in May 2025.

Read more

Read more about

27 August 2026

Works council and right of consent for changes to home working policy

Around the summer of 2025, two judgments were published on a highly topical issue: changes to home working policy. From the United States, a trend seems to be spreading to the Netherlands in which companies are trying to force employees to work from the office more often, or even full-time.

Read more

Read more about

13 August 2026

New Act on Transfer of Undertakings in Bankruptcy (WOVOF): consequences for employees and restart entrepreneurs

Some time ago, a blog was published on our website about the protection of employees in a restart following bankruptcy. It was relevant then and remains a topical issue now, as the Act on the Transfer of Undertakings in Bankruptcy (Wet Overgang van Onderneming in Faillissement, WOVOF) is approaching.

Read more

Read more about

16 July 2026

Love in the workplace: employment law considerations

Cupid does not let his arrows be guided by HR policies. That situations of love at the work place do not always come without consequences became clear again after the Coldplay concert end of 2025.

Read more

Read more about

29 June 2026

Pension compensation: a hot topic

Exactly one year ago, I wrote a blog about the impact of dismissal on eligibility for pension compensation from a pension provider.

Read more

Read more about
All articles