13 March 2023

Non-compliance in real estate

By Marie-Christine Veltkamp-van Paassen

Unfortunately, it sometimes happens that hidden defects emerge after the purchase of a property. These could include faulty roof structure, dampness or foundation issues.

This may come as a surprise to both the buyer and the seller. The disappointed buyer usually wants to have their losses compensated or repaired, or to get out of the contract altogether. But when is this possible, and when is it not? Read more about compliance in real estate in this article.

What does the law say about non-compliance in real estate?

The law states that a property (such as a home or business premises) must comply with the contract and possess the properties (1) required for normal use, and (2) required for special use if so agreed. It therefore depends on what the parties agreed and what they were entitled to expect from each other. A property advertised as ‘turnkey’ can be expected to be ready to use, while a property advertised as a ‘refurbishment’ offers something very different.

Moreover, parties can also deviate from statutory provisions. For example, the NVM agreement (which are often used when buying homes) includes a provision that differs from statutory provisions. The same applies to age and materials clauses. These deviate from basic legal principles and are relevant to the issue of non-compliance.

Obligation to investigate vs. duty to disclose

To assess whether non-compliance exists, the buyer’s obligation to investigate and the seller’s duty of disclosure are important. A buyer can be expected to conduct thorough research into the property being bought. In principle, if you buy a property directly on the basis of an advertisement, you are in a worse legal position than if you have viewed the property several times and had a structural survey carried out. If certain problems emerge from a structural survey, the buyer can then be expected to have additional research done. For instance, if damp issues are identified, we recommend having additional research done to find out what caused them. If you do not, it may be more difficult to get compensation for any damage afterwards.

On the other hand, a seller also has a duty of disclosure. For example, if the seller knows about faulty foundations or damp issues, it is obliged to disclose this to potential buyers. If the seller does not do so, they cannot successfully defend themselves against the buyer by claiming that the buyer did not conduct sufficient research. After all, the seller should have reported this.

Note: make sure to report complaints in time!

If, as a buyer, you discover that there is non-compliance, it is important that you report any complaints about this to the seller in good time. If you do not, you risk being left empty-handed. By law, the buyer must complain in any case ‘within a reasonable period of time’ after the buyer discovers or should have discovered the defect. A deadline of two months is generally considered timely. If the buyer complains later, whether his complaint is still timely depends on the circumstances of the case.

Possible remedies

In a case of non-compliance, you have several options. For example, you can demand that defects are repaired or claim compensation for damage. It is also sometimes possible to terminate or annul the agreement, in whole or in part. A partial termination or annulment of the purchase agreement results in a reduction of the purchase price. With regard to the termination of property-related purchase agreements, please refer to this article.

Non-compliance in real estate in conclusion

If you have bought property and subsequently discovered hidden defects,or if you have other questions about non-compliance in real estate,please do not hesitate to contact me or one of the other specialists at GMW advocaten. Together we can discuss what your options are.

Marie-Christine Veltkamp-van Paassen

Lawyer / associate partner

‘A Realistic Perspective with Broad Experience’

Related blogs

Previous slide
Next slide

8 July 2025

Maintenance of Rental Property: Tenant or Landlord Responsible?

In principle, the landlord is responsible for the maintenance of a rental property. However, there is an exception to this rule. A distinction can be made between major and minor maintenance.

Read more

Read more about

1 July 2025

Have you ever seen the rain?

Non-conformity, hidden defects and leaks

Read more

Read more about

18 June 2025

Transfer of Risk in the Sale or Purchase of a Property

The sale or purchase of a property is a complex process involving legal elements.

Read more

Read more about

21 May 2025

Fair sale of land by local authorities: Didam II clarifies the rules

In November 2024, the Dutch Supreme Court (Hoge Raad) provided further clarity on the sale of scarce land by public authorities. What does this mean for municipalities and market parties?

Read more

Read more about

23 April 2025

Neighbour, what are you doing?

A property owner or occupier may, in certain circumstances, be required to temporarily allow another person to use their home or land if this is necessary for work to be carried out on the other party’s property.

Read more

Read more about
All articles