Purchase agreement for electric cars and non-conformity

2 October 2025

Purchase agreement for electric cars and non-conformity

By Mechteld van Veen-Oudenaarden

In a ruling of the Supreme Court on 28 June 2024 concerning non-conformity in the purchase of an electric car, an important decision was made regarding the vehicle’s driving range.

The buyer had received a brochure at the time of purchase which stated the car’s driving range. The buyer relied on this information, but in reality the car did not meet the specification. As a result, the buyer was entitled to dissolve the contract on the grounds of non-conformity.

Non-conformity

Non-conformity in a purchase agreement means that the delivered product does not meet the expectations the buyer could reasonably have based on the agreement. In the case of an electric car, this may relate for example to driving range, charging capacity, or other specifications that are essential for the use of the vehicle.

Dissolution

When there is non-conformity, the buyer has various rights, including the right to dissolve the agreement. This means the buyer can undo the purchase and, in some cases, may also be entitled to compensation.

Odometer readings

There have previously been many rulings concerning the tampering with odometer readings. Rolling back the mileage of a car constitutes fraud and may also result in non-conformity in a purchase agreement. When a car is sold with a rolled-back odometer, it does not meet the buyer’s expectations, and this amounts to non-conformity. In such cases, the buyer may also dissolve the agreement and possibly claim compensation. This latest ruling now specifically concerns electric cars.

Conclusion

It is essential that, when entering into a purchase agreement for a car, all relevant information is provided accurately and that both parties are aware of their rights and obligations. In the event of a dispute concerning non-conformity, it is advisable to seek legal advice in order to take the appropriate steps and safeguard your rights.

More information

Are you dealing with a similar situation or do you have questions about non-conformity? Please feel free to contact us.

Mechteld van Veen-Oudenaarden

Lawyer/associate partner

Related blogs

Previous slide
Next slide

21 September 2026

The entrepreneur and their private assets: always protected?

Entrepreneurs can be active in different ways. They can be a director or director-major shareholder (DGA) of a private limited company, a self-employed entrepreneur operating through a sole proprietorship, or a partner within a general partnership (VOF).

Read more

Read more about

13 August 2026

New Act on Transfer of Undertakings in Bankruptcy (WOVOF): consequences for employees and restart entrepreneurs

Some time ago, a blog was published on our website about the protection of employees in a restart following bankruptcy. It was relevant then and remains a topical issue now, as the Act on the Transfer of Undertakings in Bankruptcy (Wet Overgang van Onderneming in Faillissement, WOVOF) is approaching.

Read more

Read more about

6 August 2026

Set-off and bankruptcy: what is and isn’t allowed?

Set-off is a legal mechanism whereby two parties who owe each other obligations may offset their mutual claims and debts. In an ordinary commercial relationship this is, in principle, unproblematic. However, once bankruptcy proceedings are involved, different rules apply.

Read more

Read more about

2 July 2026

Duty to provide information in a WHOA plan

The Zeeland-West Brabant District Court delivered a ruling on the debtor’s duty to provide information in a WHOA procedure.

Read more

Read more about

25 June 2026

Discharge from liability in associations

In a recent judgment of the Arnhem-Leeuwarden Court of Appeal, the central question was whether the board members of an association could rely on the discharge granted by the general members’ meeting in relation to the management of a major project (the construction of the clubhouse).

Read more

Read more about
All articles