27 July 2011

Regime of general community of property Part 3: Compensation rights

By Antoine de Werd

As per 1 January 2012, a legislative proposal on general community of goods and property takes effect, as announced in my previous weblogs (Part 1 and Part 2). 

What does this mean for divorcing couples? In order to shed some light on the practicalities, I am listing some of the changes that will affect couples filing for divorce under the new provisions.

Compensation rights

Claims for compensation may be made, whenever spouses invest their “own “money in a jointly owned asset. Couples married under the matrimonial regime of community of goods and property may still have access to own funds, such as inheritances or gifts, if these are covered by an exemption clause.

Let us take, for example, a couple that is married under the regime of community of property. The husband inherited € 50,000 under an exemption clause (see article: Divorce and exclusion clauses under dutch law  inheritances) and, invests it in the improvement of the matrimonial home. This home, however, is covered by the community of property and goods. Should the couple decide to file for divorce, the husband will have a claim for compensation, since he has invested his ’own’ money, to raise the value of the matrimonial home. Therefore, he is entitled to his € 50.000, before the house, including the increased value, gets equally divided.

The situation, at present

At present, the husband has a “nominal ’right to claim the € 50,000 invested in the matrimonial home. Increased or decreased value of the house is not taken into account.

The future situation

After 1 January 2012, things will change insofar, as the husband will then be able to claim the invested sum plus the increased value or minus the decreased value, that occurred due to his investment.  The moment in time, when the money was invested, is irrelevant. However, future jurisprudence may alter the situation, as disputes are to be expected.

When does the new situation take effect?

The new legislative proposal takes immediate effect on 1 January 2012, leaving all claims for compensation previous to this date unaltered. Couples filing for divorce after 1 January 2012, will have to divide their assets under the new provisions, except for compensation rights that stem from an earlier date; these earlier compensation rights will still be covered by the ’old’ legal provisions.

The situation is rather complex and sound legal advice is often needed to sort out things.

Advice you can trust

If you would like to know more about what this means for your situation, or you have another question about international divorce and the division of assets, please contact me.

Antoine de Werd

Antoine de Werd

Lawyer and mediator/partner

Related blogs

Previous slide
Next slide

14 September 2026

Drawing up maintenance arrangements; a good idea?

Is it worthwhile to record maintenance arrangements? In this article, I explain why it can be important to make clear arrangements on this issue.

Read more

Read more about

10 September 2026

Interest rate compensation when dividing the marital home after divorce

A divorce often involves difficult decisions. One of the most significant questions is what should happen to the jointly owned home.

Read more

Read more about

26 August 2026

Divorce Day

On Friday 11 September 2026, it will be Divorce Day. This day was established by the Association of Family and Inheritance Lawyers Divorce Mediators (vFAS). On Divorce Day, you can visit us for free personal advice.

Read more

Read more about

20 August 2026

Does personal injury compensation remain private property in the event of divorce?

On 4 March 2025, the Arnhem-Leeuwarden Court of Appeal gave a judgment illustrating how complex the division of personal injury compensation can be in divorce proceedings.

Read more

Read more about

30 July 2026

How is maintenance for young adults determined in divorce proceedings?

How exactly are maintenance contributions for young adults determined in divorce proceedings? The Dutch Supreme Court provided clarification on this issue.

Read more

Read more about
All articles