6 April 2021

Working from home: what is the employer responsible and liable for?

By Koen Vermeulen

The Work Where You Want Act, which would establish a right to work from home, will not be introduced for the time being.

Nonetheless, working from home is here to stay, even after the corona crisis. What does this entail for occupational health and safety obligations and liability risks for the employer?

Furnish your home workplace ergonomically

The employer’s duty of care for the home workplace is more limited than the Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) obligations that apply within an office or factory space. The employer must ensure that the employee has an ergonomically designed workplace. That means providing a good and large enough desk, an adjustable desk chair, a well-adjusted screen and accompanying aids. “Taking care of” does not mean that the employer must purchase everything (new) for the employee, if the employee already has an ergonomically well-designed workplace. The point is that the employer must determine whether the employee has a good workplace at home.

Check at home

This duty of care means that the employer may ask the employee to give an impression of his or her home workplace by sharing photos or videos. An alternative is for an employee of the Occupational Health and Safety Service to inspect the employee’s home on behalf of the employer and check whether the workplace is ergonomically sound and therefore “arbo-proof”. If the inspection shows that the workplace is not ergonomically designed, while the employee is expected to work from home, then the employer is obliged to provide the employee with the correct equipment (chair, desk). However, if an employee only occasionally works from home, the obligation to provide an ergonomically designed home workplace does not apply.

Cost

The main rule of the Working Conditions Act is that the costs of furnishing the workplace are for the account of the employer. The employer does not charge the employee any costs for the workplace at the office. However, agreements on reimbursement of costs for furnishing the workplace can be made in a work from home policy or from home working agreement.

Prevent burn out

Just as with working at the office or in the factory, the employer has another duty of care for employees working from home: to implement a policy that prevents the workload from becoming too high and the employee from getting a burnout (limiting the so-called psychosocial workload). After all, stress and burnout can lead to illness with all the associated costs – continued payment of wages during illness and possibly even employer’s liability for further damage. As an employer, for example, arrange for regular (team) consultation about work pressure, and provide information about safeguarding the balance between work and private life – especially when working from home. These are open doors, but in order to avoid any liability for burnout of homeworkers, it is important that the employer can demonstrate that they have provided information and education to prevent excessive work pressure.

Work from home policy and home work agreement

Now that working from home will be the norm for some time and will remain more common after the corona crisis, it is sensible to formalise a home working policy. This can be done by laying down conditions for working from home in a home working policy: with regard to risks and liability, mutual OHS obligations, privacy aspects, and cost reimbursements. The Works Council will usually have to be involved in this, and it is important to include working from home in the mandatory risk inventory and evaluation (RI&E).

In order to prevent liability for working from home as much as possible, we advise you to start working with a home working policy now.

If you have a question, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Koen Vermeulen

Lawyer/associate partner

Related blogs

Previous slide
Next slide

17 September 2026

Dismissal for lying about working from home

Incorrectly registering a workplace can constitute an urgent reason for summary dismissal. The Rotterdam District Court recently confirmed this in a judgment. The case concerned an employee of online bank Bunq. Over a period of three months, the employee stated 21 times that he was working from the office in Rotterdam, while other data showed that he was not at the office.

Read more

Read more about

3 September 2026

Employer, may I move to a competitor?

Many employers include a non-compete and/or non-solicitation clause in their employment contracts. If an employee wants to work for a client or a competitor of the employer, and the employer does not allow this, the employee may feel compelled to take the matter to court. That was also the case in a ruling by the Zeeland-West Brabant Subdistrict Court in May 2025.

Read more

Read more about

27 August 2026

Works council and right of consent for changes to home working policy

Around the summer of 2025, two judgments were published on a highly topical issue: changes to home working policy. From the United States, a trend seems to be spreading to the Netherlands in which companies are trying to force employees to work from the office more often, or even full-time.

Read more

Read more about

13 August 2026

New Act on Transfer of Undertakings in Bankruptcy (WOVOF): consequences for employees and restart entrepreneurs

Some time ago, a blog was published on our website about the protection of employees in a restart following bankruptcy. It was relevant then and remains a topical issue now, as the Act on the Transfer of Undertakings in Bankruptcy (Wet Overgang van Onderneming in Faillissement, WOVOF) is approaching.

Read more

Read more about

16 July 2026

Love in the workplace: employment law considerations

Cupid does not let his arrows be guided by HR policies. That situations of love at the work place do not always come without consequences became clear again after the Coldplay concert end of 2025.

Read more

Read more about
All articles