Variable compensation and salary continuation during illness

14 November 2024

Variable compensation and salary continuation during illness

By Anja Blijham

During the first two years of illness, an employee has the right to receive at least 70% of their salary.

The question arises regarding the payment of variable components of the salary, such as commission, bonuses, or overtime pay during sickness. Is an employer obligated to continue paying these components during an employee’s illness?

Salary: Fixed and Variable Compensation

The obligation to continue paying salary during illness has a broad interpretation. This means that the requirement to continue payment extends beyond just the base salary and vacation allowance of an employee. If an employee is entitled to a possible thirteenth-month bonus, overtime hours, or additional allowances, these also form part of the salary to be paid. The same applies to commission or bonuses, which should generally be paid based on the type of compensation.

Variable Performance-Dependent Compensation

If a variable portion of an employee’s salary is dependent on their performance, the employee is entitled to at least 70% of the average salary they would have earned if they were not ill. This also applies to performance-related bonuses that the employee could not achieve due to illness.

It must be plausible that the employee would have achieved these performances if they were not ill. A written agreement stating that an employee forfeits their bonus during sickness is not legally valid. The rules regarding salary continuation during illness are mandatory, and agreements that deviate to the detriment of the employee are not permissible.

Variable Non-Performance-Dependent Compensation

Variable compensations not linked to an employee’s performance do not fall under the obligation to continue payment during illness. For example, a profit-sharing based on the overall profit of the employer in a specific year is not included. However, there are instances where an employee may still claim a profit-sharing even if they were ill in that year. The principle of good employer practice determines whether an employer is obligated to continue paying this form of variable compensation to a sick employee.

Conclusion

During the initial two years of illness, an employee generally has the right to receive at least 70% of their salary. When it comes to variable compensations like commissions and bonuses, a decision must be made on whether these should also be paid during sickness. Performance-dependent variable compensations are typically required to be paid, while non-performance-dependent ones such as profit-sharing are not automatically covered by the salary continuation obligation. If you have any questions regarding the payment or allocation of variable compensations during sickness, feel free to reach out to us.

More information

Do you have questions about the payment or allocation of a variable bonus during illness? Or do you have other questions on similar topics? Please feel free to contact us.

Related blogs

Previous slide
Next slide

17 September 2026

Dismissal for lying about working from home

Incorrectly registering a workplace can constitute an urgent reason for summary dismissal. The Rotterdam District Court recently confirmed this in a judgment. The case concerned an employee of online bank Bunq. Over a period of three months, the employee stated 21 times that he was working from the office in Rotterdam, while other data showed that he was not at the office.

Read more

Read more about

3 September 2026

Employer, may I move to a competitor?

Many employers include a non-compete and/or non-solicitation clause in their employment contracts. If an employee wants to work for a client or a competitor of the employer, and the employer does not allow this, the employee may feel compelled to take the matter to court. That was also the case in a ruling by the Zeeland-West Brabant Subdistrict Court in May 2025.

Read more

Read more about

27 August 2026

Works council and right of consent for changes to home working policy

Around the summer of 2025, two judgments were published on a highly topical issue: changes to home working policy. From the United States, a trend seems to be spreading to the Netherlands in which companies are trying to force employees to work from the office more often, or even full-time.

Read more

Read more about

13 August 2026

New Act on Transfer of Undertakings in Bankruptcy (WOVOF): consequences for employees and restart entrepreneurs

Some time ago, a blog was published on our website about the protection of employees in a restart following bankruptcy. It was relevant then and remains a topical issue now, as the Act on the Transfer of Undertakings in Bankruptcy (Wet Overgang van Onderneming in Faillissement, WOVOF) is approaching.

Read more

Read more about

16 July 2026

Love in the workplace: employment law considerations

Cupid does not let his arrows be guided by HR policies. That situations of love at the work place do not always come without consequences became clear again after the Coldplay concert end of 2025.

Read more

Read more about
All articles