Employers’ liability for a burnout?

9 December 2024

Employers’ liability for a burnout?

By Anja Blijham

Small mistakes can have large consequences. The same applies at work: employers’ liability is easily on the cards. Excessive work pressure, inhalation of hazardous substances or physical overload.

There are various ways employees can suffer injuries during working hours. What happens if an employee holds you liable for a burnout?

Duty of care

As an employer, you have a duty to ensure a safe working environment. Failure to do so could result in employers’ liability. This follows from Article 7:658 of the Dutch Civil Code (Burgerlijk Wetboek). Employers must try to prevent the onset of physical and mental complaints and protect employees’ safety and health. Case law has now clarified that this includes preventing burnouts. This is because the employer determines where, under what conditions and with what tools the employee performs his work. The fact that this results in psychological rather than physical complaints makes no difference to this.

Good employment practices

Under Article 7:611 of the Dutch Civil Code, the employer may also be liable for the harm done to the employee. On this basis, the employer and the employee are required to act as a reasonable and fair employer and employee. If the employer fails to fulfil this obligation and the employee suffers harm as a result, this may result in employers’ liability. Burnouts fall under harm within the meaning of Article 7:611 of the Dutch Civil Code.

Burnout: entitled to compensation?

The fact that an employee suffers a burnout is insufficient for the existence of employers’ liability. Several requirements must be met before employer’s liability is assumed. There must be harm: namely, a burnout diagnosed by a doctor. In addition, the burnout must have been suffered by the employee while performing his work for the employer. The employee must provide proof of this. This connection is often difficult to prove; after all, a burnout can have multiple causes, which cannot be medically objectively identified. The employee must therefore present evidence of ‘systematic and significant excessive workload’. An example is structurally having to work overtime or receive assignments while the employee is ill at home.

If the employer subsequently proves that it has properly fulfilled its duty of care, it will not be liable for any harm the employee claims to suffer. This also means that an employee is required to complain to the employer about a potentially excessive workload. In this regard, an active attitude of the employee is expected. It is only when the employer is at fault that liability may be assumed. If the employer can prove that gross negligence on the part of the employee caused the burnout, it will not be liable for the employee’s burnout.

Preventing employers’ liability for a burnout

The above means that an employer must take reasonable measures to ensure that an employee is not harmed while working. Here are some practical tips to encourage a healthy work environment and prevent employee burnout:

  • Ensure a good work-life balance: encourage employees to take adequate rest and make good use of their free time.
  • Offer opportunities for development: give employees the chance to grow and develop in order to stay motivated.
  • Promote a healthy work culture: encourage teamwork, recognise achievements and create a positive atmosphere in the workplace.
  • Provide flexible working hours and working from home options: give employees the flexibility to arrange work in their own way.
  • Encourage breaks and relaxation: ensure employees take regular breaks and encourage stress-reducing activities during working hours.

More information

Is an employee holding you liable as an employer for a burnout or personal injury in general and would you like assistance from a specialised lawyer? Please do not hesitate to contact us!

Related blogs

Previous slide
Next slide

11 February 2026

Love in the workplace: boundless?

Valentine’s Day is approaching once again, which raises the question: what should be done if a romantic relationship between colleagues leads to tension and problems in the workplace? If such a relationship has a negative impact on work performance or the working atmosphere, is an employer allowed to prohibit a relationship between employees, or to impose limits? These questions regularly arise in practice and legal proceedings.

Read more

Read more about

22 January 2026

What to do if an employee does not cooperate with reintegration?

When an employee is (long-term) sick, reintegration is a joint obligation of both the employee and the employer. But what if the employee refuses to cooperate in this process? What can you do according to the law? What steps are required?

Read more

Read more about

15 January 2026

Works council’s right to be consulted in an international group

The works council (ondernemingsraad, OR) is entitled to all information that it “reasonably” needs to provide advice on, for example, a reorganisation.

Read more

Read more about

3 December 2025

Don’t count the number of warnings

That five official warnings do not automatically justify a lawful dismissal was once again confirmed in a recent ruling by the Gelderland Subdistrict Court.

Read more

Read more about

30 October 2025

Heineken employee facing termination? We offer legal advice

Heineken has announced a large-scale reorganisation, as a result of which many positions will become redundant. Those employees will be offered a settlement agreement to which a so-called social plan will apply. If this applies to you, please continue reading…

Read more

Read more about
All articles