16 April 2026
Operational and financial lease: what are the differences in the context of business financing?
The distinction between operational lease and financial lease is important in the context of business financing.
Read more
2 June 2025
On 26 November 2024, the Rotterdam District Court ruled on a case involving an amount of €0,01. Despite the minimal value, the court decided that there was insufficient interest to proceed. This judgment highlights the principle that a claimant must have sufficient interest to initiate legal proceedings.
In this case, the claimant discovered an error in a previous judgment and requested a correction under Article 31(1) of the Dutch Code of Civil Procedure (Rv), concerning €0.01 in summons costs. The court had awarded €137.38 instead of the claimed €138.39.
However, the judge ruled that this discrepancy was so minor that the claimant did not have sufficient interest in pursuing the correction. The decision is based on the principle that a claimant must demonstrate an actual and concrete interest to initiate or continue legal proceedings. The judge considered that one cent did not represent sufficient interest.
The requirement of sufficient interest is a fundamental principle in Dutch procedural law. According to Article 3:303 of the Dutch Civil Code (BW), a claim can only be brought if the claimant has sufficient interest. This means that the claimant must show a real and current interest in the outcome of the case. Without such interest, the court must declare the claim inadmissible.
The Rotterdam District Court’s ruling highlights the importance of having sufficient interest when starting legal proceedings. This principle is essential for maintaining an efficient and fair legal system. It prevents the unnecessary burdening of the judiciary and protects the interests of all parties involved.
Do you have any questions following this article? Or would you like advice on company law or insolvency matters? Please feel free to contact us.