21 April 2020

Corona crisis and pension schemes: what are your options as an employer?

By Koen Vermeulen

Pension is an expensive employment condition for entrepreneurs.

Due to the corona crisis, many companies and sectors are losing a large part of their turnover. However, costs such as pension contributions continue regardless. What options does the employer have when it comes to payment of the pension contribution and the pension scheme itself?

1. Use the NOW scheme

From April 6 at the latest, an employer who has lost at least 20% in turnover can receive wage subsidy from the government NOW scheme. This is a maximum of 90% of the wage bill. Pension contributions (employer and employee share) do not fall under that wage concept. However, the NOW scheme provides an extra subsidy of 30% on top of wages, precisely so that employer costs relating to pensions, holiday allowance and other employer costs are also reimbursed by the government. This means that using the NOW offers the possibility of compensation for pension contributions. However, it is important to note that because the total pension contribution is sometimes already 15-20% of the employer’s costs, the NOW subsidy may not be sufficient to compensate for the contribution burden (separate from the maximum percentage of 90).

2. Temporarily do not pay a pension premium to the pension provider

The employer must always continue to pay the employee’s contribution, which he deducts from the employee’s wages, to the pension provider. Sometimes the pension agreement does give the employer the option to temporarily reduce or terminate the employer’s contribution (the payment reservation); this offers an opportunity to save. However, this does not offer a solution for employers covered by a compulsory sectoral pension fund (Dutch: bedrijfstakpensioenfonds, herafter BPF); they depend on the leniency of the BPF.

Based on a letter from the Labour Foundation of 21 March 2020, it now appears that a number of BPFs do allow postponed payment of the employer’s premium, or are willing to make a convenient payment arrangement. Therefore, this can give a temporary break, but postponement is not an adjustment.

3. Change, cut back the entire pension scheme

For the majority of employers, change is not an option; they fall under a compulsory BPF and depend on a possible decision by the social partners to change the pension scheme. For employers with their own pension agreement, adjustment of the pension scheme is only possible with the express, deliberate consent of the employees. Alternatively, the employer can invoke a contractual clause for a unilateral change to the pension scheme, whereby he demonstrates that a “substantial business interest” necessitates the change to the disadvantage of the employee. The corona crisis, with all its financial consequences for the employer, can be such an “important interest”.

However, in doing so, the employer may face reproach for receiving compensation for those high premium costs through the NOW scheme, even if only partly. The corona crisis therefore also requires the employer to provide concrete financial substantiation for the need to change the pension scheme. This also requires the approval of the Works Council.

As an entrepreneur it is therefore particularly important to check whether the company remains able to pay the employer part of the pension contribution, even if the NOW wage cost subsidy is used. Deferral of payment is a possibility, but if that does not offer any relief, then the pension scheme may be changed.

We are also happy to assist you in times of corona crisis. Do not hesitate to contact us.

Koen Vermeulen

Koen Vermeulen

Lawyer / associate partner

Koen Vermeulen is your sparring partner for all questions relating to labour relations and pension.

Related blogs

9 June 2023

A damaged working relationship

It can happen in the best of organisations: an employee and a manager cannot get along. Tensions in the workplace can escalate quickly, negatively affecting the working atmosphere within the department.

Read more

24 April 2023

Working from home: right or privilege?

Before the Pandemic, working from home was not facilitated by all employers. During the Pandemic, we proved altogether that (long-term) working from home and/or working at a different location than the office can work very well.

Read more

22 February 2023

Dismissal in the event of reorganisation

Reorganisations and restructurings: after a relatively quiet period the headlines are full of them again.

Read more