22 August 2024

Foreign parties and litigation costs

By Mechteld van Veen-Oudenaarden

In the Netherlands, we have the litigation costs order. If a lawsuit is lost, that party can be ordered to pay the legal costs.

This applies not only to a Dutch litigant, but also to a foreign litigant. But how does this work with a foreign party? If a foreign party fails to meet its payment obligation, one has to get the money there. This can still be quite tricky.

Foreign parties and litigation costs

Dutch law offers the possibility of bringing an incidental claim for security for legal costs. This means that the defendant, who is summoned by a foreign litigant, can claim that the foreign plaintiff must first provide security for legal costs and any damages related to the proceedings. This incident is governed by Article 224 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC).

The idea behind this is that if the defendant wins the proceedings and the plaintiff is ordered to pay the legal costs, he will not be forced to go to a far-off foreign country to try to recover these costs there, where the recognition of the Dutch judgment may also become an issue.

Failure to provide security

If a foreign claimant is ordered to provide security for legal costs and he fails to do so, that foreign claimant is declared inadmissible in his proceedings. The proceedings are then terminated.

US exception

An exception may be made to the above obligation if it appears that a treaty exists between the countries where the parties are domiciled. Such an exception exists in the case of a US plaintiff. As early as 1956, the Netherlands and the US concluded a treaty stipulating that a US national (and that includes companies), does not have to provide security for any litigation costs. A claim for security in the case of a US plaintiff will therefore be rejected.

More information

Do you have questions regarding this article? Or do you need legal advice? Please feel free to contact us.

Mechteld van Veen - Oudenaarden

Mechteld van Veen-Oudenaarden

Lawyer

Mechteld van Veen-Oudenaarden started her career as a lawyer in Rotterdam, where besides practicing maritime law, she became acquainted with insolvency law.

Related blogs

Previous slide
Next slide

27 November 2024

Disputing an invoice due to attributable breach

When a debtor believes an invoice is unjustified, they may dispute it. In this article, I will delve into disputing invoices.

Read more

Read more about

21 October 2024

A boost for businesses!

Recently, the House of Representatives in The Netherlands (de Tweede Kamer) adopted the Bill on Lifting Pledge Bans. With a minor amendment to Article 3:83 of the Dutch Civil Code, this law regulates that it is no longer possible to exclude the pledging of accounts receivable for financing purposes.

Read more

Read more about

22 August 2024

Foreign parties and litigation costs

In the Netherlands, we have the litigation costs order. If a lawsuit is lost, that party can be ordered to pay the legal costs.

Read more

Read more about

10 July 2024

Directors’ liability: ‘de facto director’

Dutch companies such as B.V.'s have their own legal personality and independently carry their rights and obligations. Directors can only be held personally liable for the debts of a B.V. under special circumstances.

Read more

Read more about

9 April 2024

Trust office foundations in the Netherlands

The phenomenon of converting shares into depository receipts for shares will raise many questions for the average entrepreneur. In this blog you will read the basic principles and some advantages and disadvantages of trust office foundations (Stichting Administratiekantoor or STAK) under Dutch law.

Read more

Read more about
All articles