Foreign parties and litigation costs

22 August 2024

Foreign parties and litigation costs

By Mechteld van Veen-Oudenaarden

In the Netherlands, we have the litigation costs order. If a lawsuit is lost, that party can be ordered to pay the legal costs.

This applies not only to a Dutch litigant, but also to a foreign litigant. But how does this work with a foreign party? If a foreign party fails to meet its payment obligation, one has to get the money there. This can still be quite tricky.

Foreign parties and litigation costs

Dutch law offers the possibility of bringing an incidental claim for security for legal costs. This means that the defendant, who is summoned by a foreign litigant, can claim that the foreign plaintiff must first provide security for legal costs and any damages related to the proceedings. This incident is governed by Article 224 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC).

The idea behind this is that if the defendant wins the proceedings and the plaintiff is ordered to pay the legal costs, he will not be forced to go to a far-off foreign country to try to recover these costs there, where the recognition of the Dutch judgment may also become an issue.

Failure to provide security

If a foreign claimant is ordered to provide security for legal costs and he fails to do so, that foreign claimant is declared inadmissible in his proceedings. The proceedings are then terminated.

US exception

An exception may be made to the above obligation if it appears that a treaty exists between the countries where the parties are domiciled. Such an exception exists in the case of a US plaintiff. As early as 1956, the Netherlands and the US concluded a treaty stipulating that a US national (and that includes companies), does not have to provide security for any litigation costs. A claim for security in the case of a US plaintiff will therefore be rejected.

More information

Do you have questions regarding this article? Or do you need legal advice? Please feel free to contact us.

Mechteld van Veen-Oudenaarden

Lawyer/associate partner

Related blogs

Previous slide
Next slide

6 August 2026

Set-off and bankruptcy: what is and isn’t allowed?

Set-off is a legal mechanism whereby two parties who owe each other obligations may offset their mutual claims and debts. In an ordinary commercial relationship this is, in principle, unproblematic. However, once bankruptcy proceedings are involved, different rules apply.

Read more

Read more about

2 July 2026

Duty to provide information in a WHOA plan

The Zeeland-West Brabant District Court delivered a ruling on the debtor’s duty to provide information in a WHOA procedure.

Read more

Read more about

25 June 2026

Discharge from liability in associations

In a recent judgment of the Arnhem-Leeuwarden Court of Appeal, the central question was whether the board members of an association could rely on the discharge granted by the general members’ meeting in relation to the management of a major project (the construction of the clubhouse).

Read more

Read more about

21 May 2026

Suretyship for entrepreneurs

Suretyship is an age-old instrument used to secure payment or performance of an obligation. The concept already existed in Roman law as a specific form of joint liability, where several debtors were bound to satisfy the same debt.

Read more

Read more about

16 April 2026

Operational and financial lease: what are the differences in the context of business financing?

The distinction between operational lease and financial lease is important in the context of business financing.

Read more

Read more about
All articles