3 May 2019
In August 2018, the Rotterdam District Court issued an interesting judgment that I wish to share with you.
It regards a case about a 10-year-old boy playing at Sparta Rotterdam. Before the divorce, the parents lived with their son and their 2-year-old daughter in Capelle aan den IJssel, not far from Rotterdam.
This post was reviewed and updated on 18 August 2020
Since their divorce, the parents have exercised joint custody of the two children. This means that if important decisions have to be made with regard to the children, such as the choice of school or a medical intervention, both parents must give permission. If the parents cannot reach a joint decision, substitute permission may be requested from the court.
The boy was invited to come and play at AFC Ajax. For the mother, that was sufficient reason to want to move to Amsterdam. However, the father did not agree with that. The story does not explain why, but it could well be that the father lived somewhere near Rotterdam and feared that contact with his children would diminish in the event of a possible move. In any case, the parents did not agree. The mother therefore submitted a request to the court for replacement permission for a move with the children to Amsterdam.
A number of criteria have been developed in case law, in particular in the so-called “Swiss case”, which must be considered if the court has to decide on a relocation request. In fact, it is stipulated that the court must take into account all the circumstances of the case in its decision. Of course the best interests of the child play a major role, but other interests must certainly also be considered. In Article 1: 253a of the Dutch Civil Code, the law stipulates that the court must make such a decision if it appears desirable in the best interests of the child.
The criteria that play a role in deciding on a relocation request are:
In this case, the mother’s request did not fully measure up to even the first criterion, because the boy’s switch from Sparta to Ajax was mentioned by the mother as the only reason for the intended relocation.
In addition, the following points in this case were also relevant:
The need for relocation was therefore not established and, on that basis, the court rejected the mother’s request. The court also considered the erratic nature of the football world and that the boy may well have to change clubs a few times. The court advised the parents to enter into discussions with each other in order to make agreements about their children.
Do you have questions about your rights and obligations as a divorced parent with children? Please contact me at your convenience.
17 May 2023
In practice, a frequent question is whether the other parent also has custody. The answer to this question depends in part on when the acknowledgement took place.Read more
19 April 2023
Can you agree to waive spousal maintenance before marriage?Read more
27 February 2023
Some of our family lawyers also work as mediators. I am one of them. Mediation in family law cases is on the rise. Nevertheless, some ambiguities about mediation still exist.Read more