10 October 2018
Significant criticism followed the submission of a bill in 2015 which proposed a change to the limitation of the duration of alimony (partner maintenance) payments.
In 2018, three political parties therefore presented an amended bill which simplified the original proposal.
The date when the new Reimbursement Partner Alimony Act will be enacted is as yet uncertain, but more information is now available about the content of this bill.
The bill contains a proposal to shorten the duration of maintenance from a maximum of 12 to 5 years. If the new bill is adopted, then the obligation to pay maintenance will apply for a maximum of half the duration of the marriage. So if parties have been married for 8 years, the maximum duration of the maintenance obligation will be 4 years.
The court can deviate from this rule, but the term may never be longer than 5 years.
Two exceptions are proposed:
In addition to these two exceptions, a hardship clause is proposed to be included in the new bill, which will allow the court to extend the duration of alimony in specific cases. This clause becomes relevant if: “termination of the benefit as a result of the expiration of the stipulated time is of such a radical nature that unchanged enforcement of this period shall be based on criteria of reasonableness and fairness of the person entitled to the benefit cannot be demanded “.
In other words, if the consequences of terminating the maintenance are unacceptable to the maintenance creditor, the judge can still make an exception to the new rules.
While the original bill also proposed a change to the basis for alimony, in the amended bill it shall remain as it is today: the solidarity between ex-spouses.
If or when the new Reimbursement Partner Alimony Act is enacted, it will not apply retroactively. So if your maintenance period is now 12 years old, it will not automatically shorten.
Feel free to contact me; I’ll be glad to assist you.
15 July 2024
When parents of a child end their relationship, they must make arrangements regarding the division of the costs of care and upbringing of their child. Parents are generally free to determine these arrangements themselves. However, the principle is that a child should not suffer any financial disadvantage following the end of their parents' relationship.
Read more3 July 2024
When dividing the joint house (for example, in the event of divorce or termination of cohabitation), it often happens that one party takes over the home with the mortgage, and the other party looks for new housing.
Read more24 June 2024
When parents split up, agreements have to be made about the care arrangements.
Read more