20 November 2023

Work wherever you want in 2023?!

By Koen Vermeulen

The corona pandemic has been behind us for a while now. A period when working from home or elsewhere than in the workplace was the norm.

The legislative proposal with the somewhat misleading name ‘Work where you want’ also dates from this period. But what is happening to this announced ‘right’ for employees to decide on their own workplace?

No right to work where you want

It is important to note first, that the legislative proposal – currently before the Lower House – does not give employees the right to decide where they work. The objective of the law is to ‘facilitate dialogue about the workplace and give the employee a greater say in it’. The latter is reflected in the new legal requirement that the employer must comply with a request for a change in the workplace, unless the employer finds that, in view of all the circumstances, its interests outweigh the interests of the employee according to the standards of reasonableness and fairness. So what will this look like?

Balancing of interests when granting/rejecting requests to work from home

  1. The employee applies in writing to the employer for permission to work elsewhere. The employee must justify this request, i.e. give reasons, as well as indicate the amount of time he/she will be working from home and how his/her home office is arranged;
  2. The request must pertain to working from the employee’s own home in an EU country. Stricter rules apply in the case of a request to work from the employee’s own home outside the EU or from the local coffee shop, and it is easier for the employer to reject the request;
  3. The request must be made two months before the desired starting date of working from home;
  4. The employer must consult with the employee about the request;
  5. What interests can the employer raise?
  • The employer can raise the interest of maintaining ‘social cohesion in the workplace’ to deny the request to work elsewhere or limit it to a certain number of specific days;
  • The employer may also include the costs associated with home-based employees, such as costs associated with setting up the home office under the Occupational Health and Safety Act (Arbowet), in its decision to grant or deny a request to work elsewhere;
  • The nature of the work or ICT security risks may also be reasons to reject the request on the basis of reasonableness and fairness;
  • Finally, the legislative proposal initiators also mention the employee’s private circumstances and productivity as circumstances that play a role when balancing interests.

 Legislative proposal acts as a ‘big stick’

This legislative proposal Work Where You Want (Werken waar je wilt) amends the Flexible Working Act (Wet flexibel werken), which intends to give employee’s a ‘big stick’ when making a request to work from home. In all the circumstances, reasonableness and fairness afford the employer sufficient latitude to deny the request. The initiators explicitly leave it to the courts to provide a framework for this reasonableness and fairness in the balancing of interests. The Upper House is critical of the latter, as indicated by questions in late January 2023. It is preferable for employers and employees to have more clarity beforehand, so that the ‘big stick’ of pursuing litigation does not need to be used as often.

Work wherever you want, unless…

Although the initiators have listed a number of reasons and circumstances that might cause an employer to reject a request, the courts might be more inclined to decide the balancing of interests in the employee’s favour. During the pandemic, for example, it was shown in case law that employees can largely work from home and, in practice, many organisations have done so without problems regarding security, social cohesion or loss of productivity. Back then, many employers already developed policies based on working from home. This new law means that it is wise for employers to review these working from home policies in order to interpret reasonableness and fairness in advance. It is possible that the Flexible Working Act will be supplemented with this ‘entitlement’ to work from home as early as 1 July 2023.


Please note that the bill has been rejected.


More information

Do you have any legal questions or would you like more information? Please do not hesitate to contact us.

Koen Vermeulen

Koen Vermeulen

Lawyer / associate partner

‘Solving Complex Legal Puzzles Together’

Related blogs

Previous slide
Next slide

18 March 2025

Holiday During Sick Leave: Is Permission Required?

What are the rights and obligations of employees who wish to go on holiday while on sick leave? In this blog, we explain the legal rules, the role of the company doctor, and the possible consequences if a sick employee goes on holiday without permission.

Read more

Read more about

17 March 2025

Obligations under the Collective Dismissal Notification Act

Under the Dutch Collective Dismissal Notification Act (WMCO), you are required to notify the Employment Insurance Agency (UWV) of the dismissal of 20 or more employees within three months. In this blog, we share some practical tips.

Read more

Read more about

5 March 2025

Building a paper trail in Dismissal Cases

Wherever people work together, employment relationships can be disrupted due to various circumstances. If an employer no longer wishes to continue an employment contract for this reason, the court will assess whether there is a valid ground for termination. In such cases, the dismissal file plays a crucial role.

Read more

Read more about

25 February 2025

Immediate Dismissal of a Sick Employee

During the first two years of an employee’s illness, an employer is generally not allowed to terminate the employment contract. However, there are exceptions to this rule. The dismissal protection does not apply if the sick employee is dismissed for urgent reasons, meaning they are dismissed on the spot (summary dismissal).

Read more

Read more about

12 February 2025

Gross misconduct by employer due to breach of reintegration obligations

An employer may request the court to terminate an employment contract on the grounds of a disrupted working relationship. In some cases, the court grants termination and concludes that the disruption resulted from gross misconduct by the employer. Such cases are exceptional.

Read more

Read more about
All articles