5 March 2025

Building a paper trail in Dismissal Cases

By Amber Willemsen

Wherever people work together, employment relationships can be disrupted due to various circumstances. If an employer no longer wishes to continue an employment contract for this reason, the court will assess whether there is a valid ground for termination. In such cases, the dismissal file plays a crucial role.

A recent ruling once again highlights that not only the size of such a file but its content is of decisive importance.

Termination Request

When the case reached the court, a lot had already been going on. The employee, who had worked for the company for over twenty years and most recently served as a supervisor, went on sick leave and remained unfit for work for more than 2.5 years.

After his recovery, a six-month improvement plan was initiated, during which he worked as a supervisor at a different location. After six months, it was agreed to extend the improvement plan, but this time at his original workplace. However, his team was not receptive to this. Both the acting supervisor and around fifteen employees (anonymously) expressed objections to the employee’s return.

The employer then filed a termination request with the court, citing underperformance (D-ground), culpable conduct (E-ground), a disrupted working relationship (G-ground), and the cumulative ground (I-ground). However, the lower court denied the dismissal request.

Appeal

On appeal, the court ruled that the employer could reasonably be expected to continue the employment contract for the following reasons:

  • The long duration of the employment relationship
  • The employee’s positive performance evaluations before his sick leave and the arrival of a new manager
  • The absence of an improvement plan at his original workplace
  • The lack of a meaningful conversation between the employee and the colleagues who (over two years later) complained about his leadership style
  • The availability of supervisor vacancies within the company
  • The employee’s strong performance as a supervisor at the other location
  • The employee’s personal interest in maintaining his employment contract

Impeccable Service Record

The final ruling was that the employee had to be reinstated as a supervisor in Amsterdam (the other location), where he had successfully worked for six months. This case illustrates that in dismissal cases, not just the size of the file matters, but more importantly, its content. Proper file building is essential in dismissal cases.

The interests of an employee, especially one with a long and impeccable service record, are heavily weighted by the court. Moreover, this ruling reaffirms that courts expect employers to seriously consider reassignment options.

More Information

Do you have questions about file building in a dismissal case? Or do you need legal advice in a similar situation? Feel free to contact us.

Court of Appeal Amsterdam, April 30, 2024, ECLI (summary): 1159

(This article was previously published in HR Rendement.)

Amber Willemsen

Lawyer

‘Driven by Justice’

Related blogs

Previous slide
Next slide

23 July 2025

Medical decision making in the employment relationship from the employer’s perspective

Employers often perceive sickness notifications and absenteeism as a significant burden. This is understandable. Employees on sick leave would also prefer to be at work rather than at home unable to work.

Read more

Read more about

16 July 2025

Business closure: what to do with employees?

The company is shutting down. This may be due to poor financial performance or because the sole owner is seriously ill or has passed away. However, ceasing operations and closing the doors does not mean that employment contracts with staff automatically end. So how does this work?

Read more

Read more about

10 July 2025

Implications of the Uber-ruling for companies employing freelancers

Is a freelancer an employee or a contractor? The distinction carries major implications for legal protection, as well as financial and tax consequences.

Read more

Read more about

3 July 2025

Definitely not good employment practice

The Amsterdam Cantonal Court recently issued a ruling that provides insight into court procedures for terminating an employment contract. The decision underscores the importance for employers to handle termination requests with care.

Read more

Read more about

23 June 2025

Can you dismiss a ‘benchwarmer’?

A "benchwarmer" is an employee who has little to no work and, as a result, is not productive enough.

Read more

Read more about
All articles