Enforcing the establishment and recognition of a works council

25 November 2024

Enforcing the establishment and recognition of a works council

By Koen Vermeulen

Nearly one-third of companies with more than 50 employees do not have a works council (WC).

This is incorrect, as the law obliges such companies to establish a works council. The responsibility lies with the employer. If the employer fails to comply with the Dutch Works Councils Act (WOR), employees who wish to establish a works council can take the matter to the subdistrict court.

Compliance with WOR is no longer optional

In December 2023, we wrote that the Minister of Social Affairs and Employment (SZW) would introduce regulations to put more pressure on compliance with the WOR, as it had already been established that 31% of companies with more than 50 employees do not have a works council. On 23 May 2024, the minister presented follow-up research showing various reasons why a WC has not been established in these companies. Regardless, the minister noted that it is up to the employer to make efforts to establish a WC. Employers should motivate employees and ensure clear communication and information about what a WC does, according to the minister. She further announced that in 2025, she would introduce “policy instruments” to promote compliance with the WOR concerning the establishment of a WC in companies with 50+ employees.

Legal action for WC recognition

Employees already have the option to enforce the establishment of a WC through the subdistrict court, though this is rarely done. A recent exception is a judgment by the Subdistrict Court of Zaanstad on 7 February 2024 regarding the recognition—not so much the establishment—of the WC at BurgGolf’s golf courses.

The former director and HR manager of BurgGolf recognised the statutory obligation to establish a WC in early 2023 and took steps towards this. BurgGolf also outlined the steps to interested employees, such as appointing a temporary chairperson, establishing regulations, nominating candidates, and organising elections. Eventually, six WC members were appointed without elections, thus completing the establishment of the BurgGolf WC.

The new statutory director had a different view at the end of 2023 and was unaware of the existence of a (legally valid) WC. At that time, a potential takeover of BurgGolf was on the table, about which the WC had not yet received a request for advice and had many questions. To ensure its role in this advisory process, the WC went to the subdistrict court to enforce recognition as a WC.

Court orders BurgGolf to treat works council as legally valid

The subdistrict court found that a WC had been validly established and that BurgGolf had always acted as if there was a fully functioning, legally valid WC. Any formal deficiencies in the establishment and composition, such as those concerning elections, were outweighed by BurgGolf’s statutory obligation to establish a WC and implement employee participation. This is precisely the obligation the minister has recently emphasised.

However, this did not lead to the summary judgment sought by the WC for recognition. Nevertheless, the court required BurgGolf to treat the WC as a legally valid WC; BurgGolf must therefore simply comply with the WOR.

Enforcing compliance with WOR via the courts

This ruling confirms the existing options for so-called private law enforcement of the WOR via the courts. Whether the minister will introduce public law enforcement of the WOR in 2025 remains to be seen. In any case, as this recent ruling shows, the WC currently has sufficient options for enforcing the WOR through the courts.

More information

If you have any questions about this article or require advice from an employment law attorney, please contact us.

Koen Vermeulen

Lawyer/associate partner

Related blogs

Previous slide
Next slide

17 September 2026

Dismissal for lying about working from home

Incorrectly registering a workplace can constitute an urgent reason for summary dismissal. The Rotterdam District Court recently confirmed this in a judgment. The case concerned an employee of online bank Bunq. Over a period of three months, the employee stated 21 times that he was working from the office in Rotterdam, while other data showed that he was not at the office.

Read more

Read more about

3 September 2026

Employer, may I move to a competitor?

Many employers include a non-compete and/or non-solicitation clause in their employment contracts. If an employee wants to work for a client or a competitor of the employer, and the employer does not allow this, the employee may feel compelled to take the matter to court. That was also the case in a ruling by the Zeeland-West Brabant Subdistrict Court in May 2025.

Read more

Read more about

27 August 2026

Works council and right of consent for changes to home working policy

Around the summer of 2025, two judgments were published on a highly topical issue: changes to home working policy. From the United States, a trend seems to be spreading to the Netherlands in which companies are trying to force employees to work from the office more often, or even full-time.

Read more

Read more about

13 August 2026

New Act on Transfer of Undertakings in Bankruptcy (WOVOF): consequences for employees and restart entrepreneurs

Some time ago, a blog was published on our website about the protection of employees in a restart following bankruptcy. It was relevant then and remains a topical issue now, as the Act on the Transfer of Undertakings in Bankruptcy (Wet Overgang van Onderneming in Faillissement, WOVOF) is approaching.

Read more

Read more about

16 July 2026

Love in the workplace: employment law considerations

Cupid does not let his arrows be guided by HR policies. That situations of love at the work place do not always come without consequences became clear again after the Coldplay concert end of 2025.

Read more

Read more about
All articles