Suretyship for entrepreneurs

21 May 2026

Suretyship for entrepreneurs

By Wladimir Schmidt

Suretyship is an age-old instrument used to secure payment or performance of an obligation. The concept already existed in Roman law as a specific form of joint liability, where several debtors were bound to satisfy the same debt.

Through the French Code Civil, suretyship was introduced into the former Dutch Civil Code. It was subsequently incorporated into the current Dutch Civil Code, in Article 7:850. The provision reads: “Suretyship is the agreement whereby one party, the surety, undertakes towards another party, the creditor, to perform an obligation that a third party, the principal debtor, has or will have towards the creditor.”

This article explains the two types of suretyship recognised in civil law. It also outlines what to consider when entering into a suretyship and what your rights and obligations are once you have acted as a surety.

Types of suretyship

In civil practice, two types of suretyship are distinguished: private suretyship and business suretyship.

For both forms, the principle applies that if the debtor is unable to fulfil their obligations towards the creditor for any reason, the creditor may recover the claim from the entire assets of the surety. It is therefore common for banks to require a director–major shareholder (DGA) to provide a surety when financing their company.

What are the differences between the two types of suretyship?

A private suretyship is entered into by a so-called natural person. This is a person of flesh and blood who holds rights and obligations. In this case, the person does not act in the exercise of a profession or business. The natural person, or private individual, therefore commits their entire private assets to the creditor. This is a far-reaching obligation.

As a result, a private surety runs a financial risk if the principal debtor defaults. That potential personal financial risk can also cause tension in the surety’s personal relationships.

A business suretyship is entered into within the normal course of business activities. In other words, it forms part of the “ordinary activities of an enterprise”. This means that a suretyship entered into by a natural person can still qualify as a business suretyship.

When does something qualify as part of the ‘ordinary activities of the business’?

To answer this question, it must be assessed whether the financing for which the suretyship was given benefits the business. It is not sufficient that the creditor merely wanted to cover an unusual risk.

Example: a small SME that once obtained financing but subsequently repaid it and does not regularly take out new loans to finance investments is less likely to fall within the scope of business suretyship. By contrast, a business that frequently obtains new financing—for example to start new projects—will more likely be considered to have entered into a business suretyship.

Rights of the surety

A surety naturally has not only obligations but also rights. For example, the surety cannot independently raise defences against the claim for which the suretyship was given, but they may raise all defences that the debtor could have raised.

A suretyship can exist without the debtor being aware of it, for example when the creditor and the surety conclude a separate agreement. However, a suretyship can never exist without an underlying financing arrangement or debt—there must always be an obligation between the creditor and the debtor.

If the debtor’s obligation towards the creditor no longer exists, the creditor cannot enforce the suretyship against the surety.

If the agreement between the creditor and the debtor has ceased to exist due to limitation (statute of limitations), the suretyship also comes to an end.

Another right of the surety is that the creditor can only prove a suretyship against the surety by means of a signed written document.

When is a suretyship no longer valid?

If the surety is called upon, they acquire a statutory right of recourse against the debtor for everything they have paid to the creditor.

A surety can only be held liable once the debtor is in default. This means that the debtor has failed to fulfil their payment obligations towards the creditor despite having been formally demanded to do so. When the creditor puts the debtor in default, the creditor must also notify the surety at the same time.

Additional protection for private sureties

Because a private surety commits their entire private assets, the law provides additional protections in relation to the creditor:

  • The creditor has a special duty of care towards the surety. This means that at the start of the suretyship agreement the creditor must warn the surety about the risks involved. This obligation applies particularly to banks.
  • A maximum amount for which the surety is liable must be agreed, and that amount must be proportionate to the debtor’s debt.
  • A suretyship for future obligations must have a defined duration, which must also be proportionate to the debt.
  • If a private surety is married or in a registered partnership, the consent of the spouse or registered partner is required.

An agreement with many aspects

At first glance, a suretyship agreement may appear straightforward and self-evident. In reality, however, it is not.

Anyone acting as a surety should carefully consider—and properly record—the legal basis and purpose of the suretyship. Likewise, if a surety is approached by a creditor for payment, the surety should be aware of their rights in order to avoid unnecessarily complying with demands made by the creditor.

More information

Have you been asked to provide a suretyship? Or are you confronted by a creditor as a surety? Please feel free to contact us without obligation. We will be happy to assist you.

Related blogs

Previous slide
Next slide

21 May 2026

Suretyship for entrepreneurs

Suretyship is an age-old instrument used to secure payment or performance of an obligation. The concept already existed in Roman law as a specific form of joint liability, where several debtors were bound to satisfy the same debt.

Read more

Read more about

16 April 2026

Operational and financial lease: what are the differences in the context of business financing?

The distinction between operational lease and financial lease is important in the context of business financing.

Read more

Read more about

26 March 2026

The conditions for a bank guarantee to lift a seizure

Provisinal (or prejudgment) seizure of a bank account is a powerful tool for creditors to safeguard their recourse position, before a court has ruled definitively on a claim. For the party whose assets are attached, however, such attachment can be highly disruptive.

Read more

Read more about

23 February 2026

Directors’ liability: often claimed, difficult to prove

Directors’ liability sounds threatening. In practice, however, a claim brought by a bankruptcy trustee is difficult to win. The threshold for directors’ liability is high. It therefore pays to take a critical look at such liability claims and to provide a solid defence.

Read more

Read more about

27 November 2025

Interpretation of contracts: the Haviltex-ruling

Most business disputes arise from differing interpretations of agreements. That is not surprising. As Paul Scholten already said in 1909: “Words are never clear on their own.”

Read more

Read more about
All articles