6 November 2024

Suspension of salary or discontinuation of salary

By Anja Blijham

A sick employee is entitled to 104 weeks of continued salary payment, but this entitlement comes with responsibilities. The employee must actively engage in their reintegration process and cooperate towards a swift recovery.

However, if the employee fails to meet these obligations adequately, the employer is faced with the decision of implementing either a salary suspension or a salary stop.

Suspension of salary

In cases where an employee refuses to adhere to control regulations necessary for determining their entitlement to salary during illness, the employer may opt for salary suspension. These control regulations are in place to ensure that the employer can accurately assess the employee’s work incapacity. Compliance with these regulations, such as attending scheduled appointments with the company doctor and being available at specified times, is essential for the employer’s decision-making process.

The decision to suspend salary should only be made if the employer is unable to verify the employee’s actual work incapacity. During a salary suspension, the employer delays payment to the employee. If the employee subsequently cooperates with their reintegration obligations, the employer is obligated to retroactively pay the withheld salary. Therefore, salary suspension serves as a strategic tool to motivate the employee to fulfil their reintegration responsibilities promptly.

Discontinuation of salary

In certain circumstances, the employer may choose to stop the employee’s salary rather than suspending it. In case of discontinuation of salary, the employee forfeits their right to receive payment during this period. Unlike salary suspension, the withheld salary is not paid retroactively if the employee later complies with their obligations. The discontinuation of salary serves as a definitive disciplinary action.

The law clearly outlines situations in which an employer is permitted to discontinue an employee’s salary. The employer can discontinue the salary in the following cases:

  • The employee deliberately causes their own  (incapacity for work);
  • The employee conceals a pre-existing condition or provides false information during their pre-employment medical examination;
  • The employee intentionally hinders or delays their recovery process;
  • The employee refuses to perform suitable work or comply with regulations aimed at facilitating suitable work;
  • The employee fails to participate in developing, evaluating, or adjusting a reintegration plan;
  • The employee submits a WIA application late or fails to submit one at all.

In such circumstances, the employee forfeits their right to salary, allowing the employer to cease payment. If the employee resumes cooperation with the reintegration process and adheres to the required regulations following the salary stoppage, payment will resume from that point onwards. So, in cases of a justified salary discontinuation, the employee is not entitled to receive salary for the duration of their non-compliance with reintegration obligations.illness

Importance of prior warning

Before implementing a salary discontinuation or suspension, it is essential for employers to provide the employee with a written warning. This warning should clearly outline the expectations placed on the employee, specify the deadline for meeting these expectations, and detail the consequences of non-compliance. If the situation does not improve following the warning, the employer may proceed with either discontinuing or suspending the salary.

Conclusion

Navigating the decision between implementing a salary discontinuation or suspension can be complex for employers. Choosing the appropriate measure is crucial as an incorrect decision may result in the employee retaining their right to salary.

More information

Do you need clarification on implementing a salary discontinuation or suspension? Or do you have any related questions? Please feel free to contact us.

Anja Blijham

Advocaat

‘Achieving the Best Results Together’

Related blogs

Previous slide
Next slide

23 July 2025

Medical decision making in the employment relationship from the employer’s perspective

Employers often perceive sickness notifications and absenteeism as a significant burden. This is understandable. Employees on sick leave would also prefer to be at work rather than at home unable to work.

Read more

Read more about

16 July 2025

Business closure: what to do with employees?

The company is shutting down. This may be due to poor financial performance or because the sole owner is seriously ill or has passed away. However, ceasing operations and closing the doors does not mean that employment contracts with staff automatically end. So how does this work?

Read more

Read more about

10 July 2025

Implications of the Uber-ruling for companies employing freelancers

Is a freelancer an employee or a contractor? The distinction carries major implications for legal protection, as well as financial and tax consequences.

Read more

Read more about

3 July 2025

Definitely not good employment practice

The Amsterdam Cantonal Court recently issued a ruling that provides insight into court procedures for terminating an employment contract. The decision underscores the importance for employers to handle termination requests with care.

Read more

Read more about

23 June 2025

Can you dismiss a ‘benchwarmer’?

A "benchwarmer" is an employee who has little to no work and, as a result, is not productive enough.

Read more

Read more about
All articles