14 November 2024

Variable compensation and salary continuation during illness

By Anja Blijham

During the first two years of illness, an employee has the right to receive at least 70% of their salary.

The question arises regarding the payment of variable components of the salary, such as commission, bonuses, or overtime pay during sickness. Is an employer obligated to continue paying these components during an employee’s illness?

Salary: Fixed and Variable Compensation

The obligation to continue paying salary during illness has a broad interpretation. This means that the requirement to continue payment extends beyond just the base salary and vacation allowance of an employee. If an employee is entitled to a possible thirteenth-month bonus, overtime hours, or additional allowances, these also form part of the salary to be paid. The same applies to commission or bonuses, which should generally be paid based on the type of compensation.

Variable Performance-Dependent Compensation

If a variable portion of an employee’s salary is dependent on their performance, the employee is entitled to at least 70% of the average salary they would have earned if they were not ill. This also applies to performance-related bonuses that the employee could not achieve due to illness.

It must be plausible that the employee would have achieved these performances if they were not ill. A written agreement stating that an employee forfeits their bonus during sickness is not legally valid. The rules regarding salary continuation during illness are mandatory, and agreements that deviate to the detriment of the employee are not permissible.

Variable Non-Performance-Dependent Compensation

Variable compensations not linked to an employee’s performance do not fall under the obligation to continue payment during illness. For example, a profit-sharing based on the overall profit of the employer in a specific year is not included. However, there are instances where an employee may still claim a profit-sharing even if they were ill in that year. The principle of good employer practice determines whether an employer is obligated to continue paying this form of variable compensation to a sick employee.

Conclusion

During the initial two years of illness, an employee generally has the right to receive at least 70% of their salary. When it comes to variable compensations like commissions and bonuses, a decision must be made on whether these should also be paid during sickness. Performance-dependent variable compensations are typically required to be paid, while non-performance-dependent ones such as profit-sharing are not automatically covered by the salary continuation obligation. If you have any questions regarding the payment or allocation of variable compensations during sickness, feel free to reach out to us.

More information

Do you have questions about the payment or allocation of a variable bonus during illness? Or do you have other questions on similar topics? Please feel free to contact us.

Anja Blijham

Advocaat

‘Achieving the Best Results Together’

Related blogs

Previous slide
Next slide

23 July 2025

Medical decision making in the employment relationship from the employer’s perspective

Employers often perceive sickness notifications and absenteeism as a significant burden. This is understandable. Employees on sick leave would also prefer to be at work rather than at home unable to work.

Read more

Read more about

16 July 2025

Business closure: what to do with employees?

The company is shutting down. This may be due to poor financial performance or because the sole owner is seriously ill or has passed away. However, ceasing operations and closing the doors does not mean that employment contracts with staff automatically end. So how does this work?

Read more

Read more about

10 July 2025

Implications of the Uber-ruling for companies employing freelancers

Is a freelancer an employee or a contractor? The distinction carries major implications for legal protection, as well as financial and tax consequences.

Read more

Read more about

3 July 2025

Definitely not good employment practice

The Amsterdam Cantonal Court recently issued a ruling that provides insight into court procedures for terminating an employment contract. The decision underscores the importance for employers to handle termination requests with care.

Read more

Read more about

23 June 2025

Can you dismiss a ‘benchwarmer’?

A "benchwarmer" is an employee who has little to no work and, as a result, is not productive enough.

Read more

Read more about
All articles