Which court can make decisions with regard to children

12 June 2024

Which court can make decisions with regard to children?

By Lise-Milou Lagerwerf

In cases of an international nature, it is necessary to determine which court has jurisdiction.

In other words, the courts of which country are entitled to make decisions. For decisions with regard to children, such as the location of the primary place of residence and care arrangements, the general rule is laid down in Article 7 of the Brussels II Regulation. This specifies that the court of the country in which a child lives at the time of initiating court proceedings, i.e. has his or her habitual residence, has jurisdiction. The rationale behind this clause is that the court of the country in which a child lives has the best understanding of the child and his or her interests. This court is often also in the best position to initiate assistance for a child where necessary.

Exception to the general rule

However, in an Overijssel court ruling of 5 April 2023 (ECLI:NL:RBOVE:2023:2211), there was an exception to the general rule mentioned above. In this case, the parents had been engaged in court proceedings for several years. At the commencement of the proceedings, the child was living in the Netherlands. During the proceedings, the child moved to Germany with the mother. Despite the fact that the child was living in the Netherlands at the time that the proceedings were initiated, in this case the Dutch court asked the German court to exercise jurisdiction over the child and make a decision, under Article 12 of the Brussels II Regulation.

The Dutch court considered this to be in the best interests of the child, since the German court was in a better position to make a decision by then. The child had become well integrated in Germany in the meantime and in addition, it proved difficult for Dutch courts to enforce a decision in Germany. There were practical problems, as a result of which Dutch court decisions could not be enforced in Germany.

Which court makes a decision?

In short, even though there was an exception to the general rule in the case above, the basic principle is that the court of the country in which a child lives decides. After all, this court has the best understanding of the child and the options for helping him or her. It is difficult for a court to serve a child’s interests when he or she lives in another country.

More information

If you would like more information or have another legal question, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Related blogs

Previous slide
Next slide

16 February 2026

Check your prenuptial agreement

Before or during marriage, spouses often enter into a prenuptial agreement. In this article, we focus specifically on prenuptial agreements that were concluded many years ago.

Read more

Read more about

5 February 2026

Who pays for the private investigator’s report?

The Arnhem-Leeuwarden Court of Appeal ruled that the costs of a private investigator’s report can be recovered from the maintenance recipient. This is happening more and more often.

Read more

Read more about

18 December 2025

Indexation of child and spousal maintenance 2026

Every year, child and spousal maintenance are increased through annual indexation. You can read more about the indexation of child support and spousal maintenance in 2026 in this blog.

Read more

Read more about

17 December 2025

Cohabiting as if married

An obligation to pay spousal maintenance can end upon remarriage or “cohabiting as if married”. In this article we discuss the burden of proof and recent case law, which has significant implications for both parties.

Read more

Read more about

11 December 2025

No maintenance contribution for young adult children in interim relief proceedings

For young adult children (aged 18 to 21), under Dutch law a (continued) maintenance obligation applies. This means that parents are required to contribute to their children’s living expenses and study costs, even after they have turned 18.

Read more

Read more about
All articles