2 April 2020

Corona crisis: may you, as a director, pay your creditors selectively?

By Christiaan Mensink

It is inevitable that companies will run into payment problems as a result of the current corona crisis.

If income largely disappears, there is not enough cash in hand to pay all the bills. Aid is available, such as short-time working, deferral of tax payments, and deferral of loan repayments by banks. However, there are still more than enough costs to be paid. As a director of a company, which debts do you pay and which do you leave unpaid? And can an unpaid creditor hold the director personally liable for unpaid debts?

Two different situations

Two different situations can be distinguished:

  1. There are temporary liquidity shortages, but with a temporary deferral of payment, reorganisation or other measures, bankruptcy is unlikely.
  2. Bankruptcy is unavoidable.

Selective payment if a company will not go bankrupt

As long as it is still realistic to expect that the company will not go bankrupt and will eventually be able to pay all its debts, selective payment of creditors is permitted. After all, no debts will remain unpaid in the end. No one will be harmed.

The question is always: how realistic is the estimate that the company will not go bankrupt? If there are doubts about this, it is advisable to record the considerations made in writing in order to be able to account for it afterwards, should things go wrong.

So make a liquidity forecast, write down when money is expected to come in and what costs will be saved. In the meantime, unnecessary debts can be paid later, while crucial debts from essential suppliers can be paid earlier. Suppliers that are required to keep the company operational will then actually have priority.

Selective payment when bankruptcy is unavoidable

Even if bankruptcy is unavoidable, the company may still pay creditors – but be careful with that. If bankruptcy is unavoidable, the equality of creditors should not be breached, unless there is a good reason for this. This justification, for instance, can be found in preventing capital destruction or keeping the company operational. Think of IT suppliers, suppliers of raw materials, employees, paying consultants to keep the company in business, and so on.

Here too, the advice is to record the choices made in writing. For example in the form of a payment schedule.

What is not permitted is only paying affiliated (group) companies or persons, or making payments in which the director has a personal interest. An example of this would be quickly paying off a credit that the director had personally guaranteed, before filing for bankruptcy.

Unlawful conduct of the director

The director’s actions may therefore be unlawful if, in the circumstances, they are negligent towards unpaid creditors and the director can be seriously blamed for this personally. This may be the case if the director should have understood that the selective payments would result in the other creditors remaining unpaid and the company being unable to recover their claim. Unwillingness to pay is a good (unallowed) example of this.

We are ready for you

Do you have any questions about this topic or about how to deal with your company’s stakeholders in difficult times? Every situation is different and requires good analysis and a good strategy. Our corporate lawyers are happy to help you with this.

Related blogs

Previous slide
Next slide

6 August 2026

Set-off and bankruptcy: what is and isn’t allowed?

Set-off is a legal mechanism whereby two parties who owe each other obligations may offset their mutual claims and debts. In an ordinary commercial relationship this is, in principle, unproblematic. However, once bankruptcy proceedings are involved, different rules apply.

Read more

Read more about

2 July 2026

Duty to provide information in a WHOA plan

The Zeeland-West Brabant District Court delivered a ruling on the debtor’s duty to provide information in a WHOA procedure.

Read more

Read more about

25 June 2026

Discharge from liability in associations

In a recent judgment of the Arnhem-Leeuwarden Court of Appeal, the central question was whether the board members of an association could rely on the discharge granted by the general members’ meeting in relation to the management of a major project (the construction of the clubhouse).

Read more

Read more about

21 May 2026

Suretyship for entrepreneurs

Suretyship is an age-old instrument used to secure payment or performance of an obligation. The concept already existed in Roman law as a specific form of joint liability, where several debtors were bound to satisfy the same debt.

Read more

Read more about

16 April 2026

Operational and financial lease: what are the differences in the context of business financing?

The distinction between operational lease and financial lease is important in the context of business financing.

Read more

Read more about
All articles