5 February 2025

A Promise is a Debt (in principle)

By Amber Willemsen

Can an employer retract a (verbal) promise to extend an employee’s contract? In principle, no. A promise is a debt.

In a recent case, a manager promised to extend an employee’s employment contract but ultimately decided not to follow through. The employee challenged this decision in court and successfully argued its case.

The discussion about extending the employee’s contract occurred during a dinner following a business event. The manager expressed doubts about offering a permanent contract due to the organization’s difficult financial situation.

When the employee asked whether he could at least count on another one-year contract, the manager indicated this would be possible if legally permissible. Both parties then toasted to this agreement.

Later, the employee inquired with HR about the possibility of extending their temporary contract, and HR confirmed it could be done. The employee relayed this information to the manager, who responded positively. However, a few months later, the employee was informed that its contract would not be renewed after all.

Authority and Promises

The court ruled that the employer, through the manager, had made an unconditional promise to extend the employee’s contract, which they could not revoke. During the dinner, the manager had clearly stated that the contract would be extended if HR confirmed it was legally permissible, which turned out to be the case. Consequently, the employer was bound by this promise.

The employer’s defense that the manager lacked the authority to make such promises, and that the employee should have known this, was dismissed by the court. It was unclear whether the employee was aware of the manager’s lack of authority. Additionally, the employee had previously discussed employment-related matters with the same manager.

In court, the employer submitted a counter-request to terminate the employment agreement, arguing that the relationship had become irreparably damaged. However, the court found that the employer had not provided sufficient evidence that returning to work was impossible or that efforts had been made to repair the working relationship.

As a result, the employee remained employed for another year.

Takeaway

The key lesson from this case is that employers must be cautious about the promises they make. Employees may have a legitimate basis to rely on those promises.

More Information

If you have questions about this article or need tailored advice, please feel free to contact us.

This article was originally published in HR-Rendement.

Amber Willemsen

Lawyer

‘Driven by Justice’

Related blogs

Previous slide
Next slide

23 July 2025

Medical decision making in the employment relationship from the employer’s perspective

Employers often perceive sickness notifications and absenteeism as a significant burden. This is understandable. Employees on sick leave would also prefer to be at work rather than at home unable to work.

Read more

Read more about

16 July 2025

Business closure: what to do with employees?

The company is shutting down. This may be due to poor financial performance or because the sole owner is seriously ill or has passed away. However, ceasing operations and closing the doors does not mean that employment contracts with staff automatically end. So how does this work?

Read more

Read more about

10 July 2025

Implications of the Uber-ruling for companies employing freelancers

Is a freelancer an employee or a contractor? The distinction carries major implications for legal protection, as well as financial and tax consequences.

Read more

Read more about

3 July 2025

Definitely not good employment practice

The Amsterdam Cantonal Court recently issued a ruling that provides insight into court procedures for terminating an employment contract. The decision underscores the importance for employers to handle termination requests with care.

Read more

Read more about

23 June 2025

Can you dismiss a ‘benchwarmer’?

A "benchwarmer" is an employee who has little to no work and, as a result, is not productive enough.

Read more

Read more about
All articles