Expiration and Forfeiture of Vacation Days: What You Need to Know

13 November 2024

Expiration and forfeiture of vacation days: what you need to know

By Mark Dijkstra

Vacation days do not remain valid indefinitely, but they also do not simply expire. This article provides an overview of the relevant rules regarding vacation days under Dutch employment law. The overview is based on the most recent jurisprudence from the Dutch Supreme Court and the European Court of Justice.

First, we need to distinguish between statutory and non-statutory vacation days, as well as between expiration and forfeiture. Statutory vacation days expire under Article 7:640a of the Dutch Civil Code six months after the year they were accrued, unless the employee was reasonably unable to take them. Non-statutory vacation days expire under Article 7:642 of the Dutch Civil Code five years after the year they were accrued. It seems straightforward, right?

Max Planck Ruling

However, the situation is more complicated than it appears. According to the Max Planck ruling by the European Court of Justice on November 6, 2018, the expiration period for statutory vacation days only applies if the employer has fulfilled their duty of care and information obligations. This means that the employer must explicitly and timely inform the employee about the expiration of vacation days, allowing the employee to enjoy their vacation before it expires. If the employer cannot prove that they have met this obligation, the vacation days cannot simply expire.

Dutch Supreme Court Ruling of June 23, 2023

In the ruling of the Dutch Supreme Court on June 23, 2023 (ECLI:NL:HR:2023:955), the question arose whether the aforementioned obligations of the employer apply only to the expiration period of statutory vacation days or whether they also apply to the expiration period of non-statutory vacation days. In other words, if vacation days do not automatically expire after six months, do they at least expire after five years?

No, the Supreme Court ruled: “there can be no reasonable doubt that the same applies to the five-year expiration period.” The ‘Max Planck obligations’ also apply to the five-year expiration period. This means that the employer must also inform the employee about the potential expiration of vacation days and do so in a timely manner, allowing the employee to take these days off.

Conclusion

Vacation days cannot simply expire or forfeit. Inform your employees in writing about the validity of their days. If your employee has a backlog of vacation days, engage in a conversation with them about taking those days and — very importantly —document this conversation properly. Only then can the vacation days eventually expire (or forfeit).

For statutory vacation days, this could be as soon as six months after the year of accrual, provided the above obligations have been fulfilled. For non-statutory vacation days, the period is longer: five years. However, as an employer, you can agree with your employee to pay out non-statutory vacation days. This is permissible under Article 7:634 of the Dutch Civil Code, but not for statutory vacation days.

More information

If one of your employees has a backlog of vacation days and you want advice on how to reduce this, or if you are an employee and your employer has allowed part of your vacation balance to expire without consultation, please contact one of the labor law attorneys at GMW.

Mark Dijkstra

Lawyer / associate partner

Related blogs

Previous slide
Next slide

17 September 2026

Dismissal for lying about working from home

Incorrectly registering a workplace can constitute an urgent reason for summary dismissal. The Rotterdam District Court recently confirmed this in a judgment. The case concerned an employee of online bank Bunq. Over a period of three months, the employee stated 21 times that he was working from the office in Rotterdam, while other data showed that he was not at the office.

Read more

Read more about

3 September 2026

Employer, may I move to a competitor?

Many employers include a non-compete and/or non-solicitation clause in their employment contracts. If an employee wants to work for a client or a competitor of the employer, and the employer does not allow this, the employee may feel compelled to take the matter to court. That was also the case in a ruling by the Zeeland-West Brabant Subdistrict Court in May 2025.

Read more

Read more about

27 August 2026

Works council and right of consent for changes to home working policy

Around the summer of 2025, two judgments were published on a highly topical issue: changes to home working policy. From the United States, a trend seems to be spreading to the Netherlands in which companies are trying to force employees to work from the office more often, or even full-time.

Read more

Read more about

13 August 2026

New Act on Transfer of Undertakings in Bankruptcy (WOVOF): consequences for employees and restart entrepreneurs

Some time ago, a blog was published on our website about the protection of employees in a restart following bankruptcy. It was relevant then and remains a topical issue now, as the Act on the Transfer of Undertakings in Bankruptcy (Wet Overgang van Onderneming in Faillissement, WOVOF) is approaching.

Read more

Read more about

16 July 2026

Love in the workplace: employment law considerations

Cupid does not let his arrows be guided by HR policies. That situations of love at the work place do not always come without consequences became clear again after the Coldplay concert end of 2025.

Read more

Read more about
All articles