20 January 2025

Respecting co-determination rights

Works councils do not often take legal action against their own management. Typically, they try to resolve disputes through constructive dialogue with the management or entrepreneur, which is often the preferred approach. However, if dialogue fails, works councils (WC) have several legal avenues available.

Using a couple of court rulings on the strained relationship between the works council of Rijkswaterstaat and its management, I will illustrate this point. The bottom line is that, at times, it may be necessary or advisable for a works council to go to court to prevent the erosion of co-determination rights.

Litigation under article 28 of the WOR

In a 2023 case, the works council challenged the incorrect application of the “Leidraad Roosterdiensten” (Roster Guidelines) at Rijkswaterstaat. This was pursued under article 28 of the Dutch Works Councils Act (WOR) in conjunction with article 36 WOR (the general dispute resolution provision). The court in Utrecht accepted this legal basis proposed by the works council.

Article 28 of the WOR assigns a duty of care to the works council, aimed at promoting compliance by the entrepreneur with regulations concerning employment terms, working conditions, and working hours. The court linked this supervisory and stimulating role to a specific procedural competence, enabling the works council to initiate proceedings when the entrepreneur fails to fulfill these responsibilities. This expands the works council’s ability to take legal action.

Litigation under article 27 of the WOR

In a subsequent case in 2024 concerning the same roster guidelines, proceedings were initiated under article 27 WOR (the right of consent). The court observed that the works council appeared to use the proceedings primarily to compel Rijkswaterstaat to take the council’s role more seriously, aiming to prevent the erosion of co-determination rights.

Despite this, the court proceeded to hear the works council’s claims. However, the council’s requests to declare that certain decisions required consent, or to declare that the invalidation of the established rosters was justified, were dismissed by the court on March 15, 2024.

Respecting co-determination rights

At the conclusion of its March 15, 2024 ruling, the subdistrict court highlighted several key principles of co-determination that both the works council and management must observe before considering litigation:

The works council must be timely and fully informed to exercise its co-determination rights, and the entrepreneur must take this responsibility seriously.
Conversely, the works council should not assume the role of the management.
Both parties must respect each other’s responsibilities.
If co-determination rights are not adequately respected, the works council can take legal action on various grounds.

More Information

Do you have questions regarding this article, or would you like advice on a similar issue? Please feel free to contact us.

This blog is an adaptation of the article “OR Rijkswaterstaat daagt bestuurder drie keer in 1 jaar”, published on OR/net in April 2024.

Koen Vermeulen

Lawyer/associate partner

LinkedIn E-mail

Related blogs

17 September 2026

Dismissal for lying about working from home

Incorrectly registering a workplace can constitute an urgent reason for summary dismissal. The Rotterdam District Court recently confirmed this in a judgment. The case concerned an employee of online bank Bunq. Over a period of three months, the employee stated 21 times that he was working from the office in Rotterdam, while other data showed that he was not at the office.

3 September 2026

Employer, may I move to a competitor?

Many employers include a non-compete and/or non-solicitation clause in their employment contracts. If an employee wants to work for a client or a competitor of the employer, and the employer does not allow this, the employee may feel compelled to take the matter to court. That was also the case in a ruling by the Zeeland-West Brabant Subdistrict Court in May 2025.

27 August 2026

Works council and right of consent for changes to home working policy

Around the summer of 2025, two judgments were published on a highly topical issue: changes to home working policy. From the United States, a trend seems to be spreading to the Netherlands in which companies are trying to force employees to work from the office more often, or even full-time.

13 August 2026

New Act on Transfer of Undertakings in Bankruptcy (WOVOF): consequences for employees and restart entrepreneurs

Some time ago, a blog was published on our website about the protection of employees in a restart following bankruptcy. It was relevant then and remains a topical issue now, as the Act on the Transfer of Undertakings in Bankruptcy (Wet Overgang van Onderneming in Faillissement, WOVOF) is approaching.

16 July 2026

Love in the workplace: employment law considerations

Cupid does not let his arrows be guided by HR policies. That situations of love at the work place do not always come without consequences became clear again after the Coldplay concert end of 2025.

All articles