The popularity of celebrities such as artists, actors and athletes has a commercial value.
They have the right to determine whether or not, and how, their portrait is commercially exploited. But, also less known individuals have portrait rights and in some cases can oppose commercial or other use of their portrait.
A portrait is not limited to a picture of a face, but can include other parts of the body as well. What matters is that the portrait can be identified as an individual person. It must be a recognisable image.
If a portrait is used, the person portrayed can oppose the use thereof if he or she has a ‘reasonable interest’. This interest may either be personal a commercial. For famous people, their popularity itself makes the unauthorised use of a portrait in a commercial way unlawful. Personal interest may consist of the use of a portrait in a certain undesirable context. Less known Dutch individuals may therefore also oppose certain forms of portrait use.
The attorneys of GMW lawyers have experience in advising and litigating on portrait rights. In our experience, in many cases going to court can be prevented. Often an amicable settlement can be reached, especially if the unlawfulness of the publication is more or less clear, for example in case of unauthorised use of a photograph in a negative context with which the person depicted has no connection. In some cases, however, going to court cannot be avoided. A rectification or an injunction against further publishing can be claimed in proceedings as well as compensation for damages.
GMW lawyers will be happy to help you with all your intellectual property issues. If you have any questions, please contact us directly using the enquiry form below or +31 (0)70 3615048. Our experts will be glad to support and advise you.
GMW lawyers will be happy to help you with all your intellectual property law issues. Do you have a question? Feel free to contact us.
"*" indicates required fields
13 August 2026
New Act on Transfer of Undertakings in Bankruptcy (WOVOF): consequences for employees and restart entrepreneurs
Some time ago, a blog was published on our website about the protection of employees in a restart following bankruptcy. It was relevant then and remains a topical issue now, as the Act on the Transfer of Undertakings in Bankruptcy (Wet Overgang van Onderneming in Faillissement, WOVOF) is approaching.
Read more
6 August 2026
Set-off and bankruptcy: what is and isn’t allowed?
Set-off is a legal mechanism whereby two parties who owe each other obligations may offset their mutual claims and debts. In an ordinary commercial relationship this is, in principle, unproblematic. However, once bankruptcy proceedings are involved, different rules apply.
Read more
2 July 2026
Duty to provide information in a WHOA plan
The Zeeland-West Brabant District Court delivered a ruling on the debtor’s duty to provide information in a WHOA procedure.
Read more
25 June 2026
Discharge from liability in associations
In a recent judgment of the Arnhem-Leeuwarden Court of Appeal, the central question was whether the board members of an association could rely on the discharge granted by the general members’ meeting in relation to the management of a major project (the construction of the clubhouse).
Read more
21 May 2026
Suretyship for entrepreneurs
Suretyship is an age-old instrument used to secure payment or performance of an obligation. The concept already existed in Roman law as a specific form of joint liability, where several debtors were bound to satisfy the same debt.
Read more
16 April 2026
Operational and financial lease: what are the differences in the context of business financing?
The distinction between operational lease and financial lease is important in the context of business financing.
Read more
26 March 2026
The conditions for a bank guarantee to lift a seizure
Provisinal (or prejudgment) seizure of a bank account is a powerful tool for creditors to safeguard their recourse position, before a court has ruled definitively on a claim. For the party whose assets are attached, however, such attachment can be highly disruptive.
Read more
23 February 2026
Directors’ liability: often claimed, difficult to prove
Directors’ liability sounds threatening. In practice, however, a claim brought by a bankruptcy trustee is difficult to win. The threshold for directors’ liability is high. It therefore pays to take a critical look at such liability claims and to provide a solid defence.
Read more
27 November 2025
Interpretation of contracts: the Haviltex-ruling
Most business disputes arise from differing interpretations of agreements. That is not surprising. As Paul Scholten already said in 1909: “Words are never clear on their own.”
Read more
