Dutch employment law protects the sick employee to a high degree.
GMW lawyers set out below how far this protection reaches.
The employer is obliged to continue to pay (part of) the salary of the sick employee for two years. During that period, the employer cannot terminate the employment contract: a prohibition of termination applies. The prohibition of termination during illness also applies if the employee is partly able to carry out the work. Only when he is able again to carry out his work in full is the prohibition no longer applicable. Setting aside the employment contract of a sick employee is however often possible.
The prohibition of termination during illness applies in principle during the first two years the employee is incapacitated for work. If periods of incapacity follow each other with intervals of less than four weeks, these are added together to determine the total term of the illness.
The period of two years can be extended. This is the case if the UWV extends the obligation to continue to pay wages. This could occur if the employer has not complied with the reintegration obligations.
The consequences of the prohibition of termination during illness are greatest in the event of commercial dismissal: commercial dismissal via UWV (termination) or the sub-district court (setting aside) is not possible. If it was the sick employee who was eligible for being made redundant on the basis of the proportionality principle, the employer must nominate the next employee on the list for redundancy. The sick employee is protected. The exception is dismissal for commercial reason due to general business cessation. And this prohibition does not apply if the employee has become incapacitated for work after the employer has submitted an application for dismissal to the UWV.
The employment contract with a sick employee can under certain conditions still be terminated. Firstly, this is possible if the employer and employee reach agreement on the termination of the employment contract. This could however have consequences for the sick employee relating to benefits and the employer can on the termination of the employment contract with a sick employee be faced with premium consequences.
In addition, there are a number of exceptions to the prohibition of termination during illness. The prohibition does not apply if the reason for the termination is not the illness and one of the following situations occur:
Finally, the employer can apply to the sub-district court to set aside the employment contract with the sick employee. The employer can request the sub-district court to set aside the employment contract with a sick employee for a different reason than illness and – therefore – for other reasons than commercial reasons. This could include setting aside due to a damaged working relationship with a sick employee, or due to unsatisfactory performance – provided the application for dismissal does not relate to the incapacity for work of the employee. The prohibition of termination does also not apply, and the employer can apply for a setting aside of the employment contract, if a sick employee refuses to cooperate in his reintegration.
GMW lawyers will be happy to help you with all your employment-related legal issues. If you have any questions, please contact us directly using the enquiry form below or +31 (0)70 3615048. Our pension and employment lawyers will be happy to support and advise you.
GMW lawyers will be happy to help you with all your employment law issues. Our lawyers assist both employers and employees.
Do you have a question? Please feel free to contact us.
"*" indicates required fields
22 November 2023
Small hearts, big consequences
Since the MeToo movement in 2017, the number of court rulings involving sexually transgressive behaviour has increased exponentially.
Read more
Read more about20 November 2023
Work wherever you want in 2023?!
The corona pandemic has been behind us for a while now. A period when working from home or elsewhere than in the workplace was the norm.
Read more
Read more about2 October 2023
The new study costs clause
Since 1 August 2022, employers may no longer charge employees for the cost of certain training and education through a study cost clause.
Read more
Read more about20 September 2023
Adaptation of whistleblowers’ scheme to new law
Adaptation of whistleblowers' scheme to new law; employers will be required to adapt internal whistleblower reporting procedures and whistleblowing employees will have increased protection from measures under employment law.
Read more
Read more about2 August 2023
Daylight robbery
People have been working from home en masse since the corona pandemic and, contrary to the expectations of some labour market experts, there seems to be no change in this trend. This is hardly surprising as working from home can have benefits for both employers and employees.
Read more
Read more about26 June 2023
The non-compete clause: is there something you can do?
Most permanent employment contracts include a non-compete clause. This clause determines that you are not allowed to work for a competing company for a certain period of time within a certain region.
Read more
Read more about19 June 2023
Performance Improvement Plan: 5 key points to consider
Termination of the employment agreement due to unsatisfactory performance is possible under Dutch employment law.
Read more
Read more about9 June 2023
A damaged working relationship
It can happen in the best of organisations: an employee and a manager cannot get along. Tensions in the workplace can escalate quickly, negatively affecting the working atmosphere within the department.
Read more
Read more about24 April 2023
Working from home: right or privilege?
Before the Pandemic, working from home was not facilitated by all employers. During the Pandemic, we proved altogether that (long-term) working from home and/or working at a different location than the office can work very well.
Read more
Read more about