Summary dismissal is also called “being fired on the spot”. It is the harshest form of dismissal and is reserved for the most urgent cases.
In such a circumstance, the employer can terminate the employment contract without having to observe a notice period by summarily dismissing the employee. Permission from the UWV (Employee Insurance Agency) is not required for this type of dismissal and possible termination prohibitions (such as illness) no longer apply.
Such a dismissal has far-reaching consequences for the employee. Besides the fact that he or she loses his or her job with immediate effect, they are also not entitled to unemployment benefits. A summary dismissal is therefore meticulously weighed by judges and only considered valid if it meets certain requirements.
First of all, the reason must be sufficiently urgent to justify dismissal. This means that as a consequence of the behaviour of the employee it cannot be expected that the employer maintains the employment contract.
Examples are: theft, embezzlement and fraud, threats or mistreatment of fellow employees and the persistent refusal to carry out reasonable orders given by the employer.
The judge assesses the nature and seriousness of the misconduct, but also takes other circumstances of the case into account. Relevant are amongst others the nature and duration of the employment, the manner in which the employee has fulfilled the employment, but also his or her personal circumstances.
If an urgent reason arises, the employer is expected to terminate the employment contract almost immediately after this reason has become known. The urgent reason for the dismissal together with the notice of termination must also be communicated to the employee forthwith. An employee must immediately understand why he or she is being fired.
There are several reasons why a judge might not consider a summary dismissal valid. First of all, the reason may not be urgent enough for such a severe sanction. Or the reason cannot be proven. Finally, sometimes the necessary formalities such as a simultaneous notification of the reason, are not always precisely observed.
In the event an employee does not accept the dismissal, he or she will have to contest the dismissal before a judge. Should the judge rule in favour of the employee and consider the dismissal not valid, this would entail that the employment contract is not to be considered terminated so that consequently (payment) obligations must still be complied with.
Employees can only contest a summary dismissal within 2 months. It is therefore very important to contact an employment lawyer immediately if you are fired on the spot.
GMW lawyers will be happy to help you with all your employment-related legal issues. If you have any questions, please contact us directly using the enquiry form below or +31 (0)70 3615048. Our pension and employment lawyers will be happy to support and advise you.
GMW lawyers will be happy to help you with all your employment law issues. Our lawyers assist both employers and employees.
Do you have a question? Please feel free to contact us.
"*" indicates required fields
15 April 2026
What to consider with overtime?
Employment contracts specify the number of hours an employee works per week. However, employees may sometimes be expected to work beyond these agreed hours, especially when approaching critical deadlines.
Read more
9 April 2026
Is an employer allowed to prohibit a dog in the workplace?
Employers have what is known as a right to issue instructions. This means they are authorised to unilaterally impose rules and guidelines on employees.
Read more
30 March 2026
Help! Is my freelancer actually an employee?
That the question of whether an agreement constitutes an employment contract or a contract for services is still very much alive, was once again demonstrated this summer by two recent court rulings.
Read more
11 February 2026
Love in the workplace: boundless?
What should be done if a romantic relationship between colleagues leads to tension and problems in the workplace? If such a relationship has a negative impact on work performance or the working atmosphere, is an employer allowed to prohibit a relationship between employees, or to impose limits? These questions regularly arise in practice and legal proceedings.
Read more
22 January 2026
What to do if an employee does not cooperate with reintegration?
When an employee is (long-term) sick, reintegration is a joint obligation of both the employee and the employer. But what if the employee refuses to cooperate in this process? What can you do according to the law? What steps are required?
Read more
15 January 2026
Works council’s right to be consulted in an international group
The works council (ondernemingsraad, OR) is entitled to all information that it “reasonably” needs to provide advice on, for example, a reorganisation.
Read more
3 December 2025
Don’t count the number of warnings
That five official warnings do not automatically justify a lawful dismissal was once again confirmed in a recent ruling by the Gelderland Subdistrict Court.
Read more
30 October 2025
Heineken employee facing termination? We offer legal advice
Heineken has announced a large-scale reorganisation, as a result of which many positions will become redundant. Those employees will be offered a settlement agreement to which a so-called social plan will apply. If this applies to you, please continue reading…
Read more
10 September 2025
Does a Validsign signature equal consent?
Employment contracts can end in various ways. For example, a fixed-term employment contract often referred to as a “temporary contract” expires on the agreed date.
Read more
