15 January 2025
Request for Permanent Employment
Since August 1, 2022, employers in the Netherlands must comply with the Transparent and Predictable Working Conditions Act.
Read more
Summary dismissal is also called “being fired on the spot”. It is the harshest form of dismissal and is reserved for the most urgent cases.
In such a circumstance, the employer can terminate the employment contract without having to observe a notice period by summarily dismissing the employee. Permission from the UWV (Employee Insurance Schemes Implementing Body) is not required for this type of dismissal and possible termination prohibitions (such as illness) no longer apply.
Such a dismissal has far-reaching consequences for the employee. Besides the fact that he or she loses his or her job with immediate effect, they are also not entitled to unemployment benefits. A summary dismissal is therefore meticulously weighed by judges and only considered valid if it meets certain requirements.
First of all, the reason must be sufficiently urgent to justify dismissal. This means that as a consequence of the behaviour of the employee it cannot be expected that the employer maintains the employment contract.
Examples are: theft, embezzlement and fraud, threats or mistreatment of fellow employees and the persistent refusal to carry out reasonable orders given by the employer.
The judge assesses the nature and seriousness of the misconduct, but also takes other circumstances of the case into account. Relevant are amongst others the nature and duration of the employment, the manner in which the employee has fulfilled the employment, but also his or her personal circumstances.
If an urgent reason arises, the employer is expected to terminate the employment contract almost immediately after this reason has become known. The urgent reason for the dismissal together with the notice of termination must also be communicated to the employee forthwith. An employee must immediately understand why he or she is being fired.
There are several reasons why a judge might not consider a summary dismissal valid. First of all, the reason may not be urgent enough for such a severe sanction. Or the reason cannot be proven. Finally, sometimes the necessary formalities such as a simultaneous notification of the reason, are not always precisely observed.
In the event an employee does not accept the dismissal, he or she will have to contest the dismissal before a judge. Should the judge rule in favour of the employee and consider the dismissal not valid, this would entail that the employment contract is not to be considered terminated so that consequently (payment) obligations must still be complied with.
Employees can only contest a summary dismissal within 2 months. It is therefore very important to contact an employment lawyer immediately if you are fired on the spot.
GMW lawyers will be happy to help you with all your employment-related legal issues. If you have any questions, please contact us directly using the enquiry form below or +31 (0)70 3615048. Our pension and employment lawyers will be happy to support and advise you.
GMW lawyers will be happy to help you with all your employment law issues. Our lawyers assist both employers and employees.
Do you have a question? Please feel free to contact us.
"*" indicates required fields
15 January 2025
Request for Permanent Employment
Since August 1, 2022, employers in the Netherlands must comply with the Transparent and Predictable Working Conditions Act.
Read more
23 December 2024
Is your company ready for a four-day work week?
With effect from 1 January 2025, AFAS will introduce a four-day working week for all its employees, who will retain their current five-day salary. Employees already working less than five days will be compensated.
Read more
18 December 2024
Three-strikes-and-you’re-out policy
In staff manuals I regularly come across the rule that a third warning automatically leads to dismissal with immediate effect. In baseball terminology, this is called a ‘three-strikes-and-you’re-out’ policy. An employer from Eindhoven also called this an ‘oei-foei-doei’ policy.
Read more
16 December 2024
Investigations into undesirable behaviour in the workplace
Physical attacks, (sexual)harassment, verbal abuse, but also inappropriate comments – these are all forms of undesirable behaviour in the workplace.
Read more
11 December 2024
Working from home not an entitlement for the time being
The corona crisis changed how organisations think about working from home. It even led to a legislative proposal; the Work Where You Want Act (wetsvoorstel ‘werken waar je wilt’) aimed at making it easier for employees and employers to reach agreements on hybrid working.
Read more
9 December 2024
Employers’ liability for a burnout?
Small mistakes can have large consequences. The same applies at work: employers’ liability is easily on the cards. Excessive work pressure, inhalation of hazardous substances or physical overload.
Read more
4 December 2024
Respecting Works Council’s Participation Rights
Works councils do not often litigate against their own management. Generally, the works council (WC) and the manager or entrepreneur prefer to resolve disputes through constructive dialogue.
Read more
25 November 2024
Enforcing the establishment and recognition of a works council
Nearly one-third of companies with more than 50 employees do not have a works council (WC).
Read more
14 November 2024
Variable compensation and salary continuation during illness
During the first two years of illness, an employee has the right to receive at least 70% of their salary.
Read more